1. tells you that w + 2 > 0, so w > -1. Not sufficient to know whether w is greater than 1.
2. w^2 > 1 means that w^2 - 1 > 0
w^2 - 1 > 0
(w - 1)(w + 1) > 0
This is a quadratic equation with two roots, -1 and 1. The quadratic equation is only positive outside the roots, so w is either smaller than -1 or greater than 1.
Another way of looking at this is to notice that 1 is the square of both 1 and -1. w^2 > 1 means that you can have either w < -1 (take w = -2 for instance) or w > 1 (take w = 3).
As you can see, 2 yields two possible intervals for w, so it's not enough either.
But put both together and using the fact that w > -1 from stmt 1 eliminates one interval from stmt 2, leaving only w > 1. C is your answer here.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
GMATprep: Is w > 1?
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
The first statement is actually saying w>-2. I think you did a typo & followed it up to your answerDanaJ wrote:1. tells you that w + 2 > 0, so w > -1. Not sufficient to know whether w is greater than 1.
2. w^2 > 1 means that w^2 - 1 > 0
w^2 - 1 > 0
(w - 1)(w + 1) > 0
This is a quadratic equation with two roots, -1 and 1. The quadratic equation is only positive outside the roots, so w is either smaller than -1 or greater than 1.
Another way of looking at this is to notice that 1 is the square of both 1 and -1. w^2 > 1 means that you can have either w < -1 (take w = -2 for instance) or w > 1 (take w = 3).
As you can see, 2 yields two possible intervals for w, so it's not enough either.
But put both together and using the fact that w > -1 from stmt 1 eliminates one interval from stmt 2, leaving only w > 1. C is your answer here.
IMO E.
I just plugged number in this one. (also notice that w is not an integer)
1) w + 2 > 0 Is clearly insufficient. (ex. w = 1 or w = 2)
2) w^2 > 1 is also insufficient (ex. w = 5 or w = -5)
together, w can be 3 and can be sufficient.
but if w = -3/2
-3/2 + 2 > 0 (satsfies)
(-3/2)^2 = 9/4 > 1(satisfies)
but -3/2 is not > 1: therefore Insufficient.
(E)
I just plugged number in this one. (also notice that w is not an integer)
1) w + 2 > 0 Is clearly insufficient. (ex. w = 1 or w = 2)
2) w^2 > 1 is also insufficient (ex. w = 5 or w = -5)
together, w can be 3 and can be sufficient.
but if w = -3/2
-3/2 + 2 > 0 (satsfies)
(-3/2)^2 = 9/4 > 1(satisfies)
but -3/2 is not > 1: therefore Insufficient.
(E)
Yeah, I sort of did... Thanks for pointing that out! Given my typo, stmt 1 does not eliminate the first interval, so the answer is indeed E.
















