Logging industry

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

Logging industry

by madhur_ahuja » Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:13 pm
Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?

(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.

(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.

(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.

(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.

(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:32 am
I'm stuck between B and D ... Is the answer "D"
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 8:01 am
Thanked: 4 times

by italian7745 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:52 am
IMO B

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:04 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by matt.lopz » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:10 am
Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?

(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.

(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.

(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.

(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.

(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.
ANSWER:

Premise 1: When large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide.

Additional Premise 2
: Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.

Conclusion: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Prove that: The amount of Carbon dioxide released in atmosphere does NOT reduce


(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed. OUT OF SCOPE.

(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly. CORRECT ANSWER!

(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species. IRRELEVANT DETAIL.

(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose. IRRELEVANT DETAIL.

(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests. IRRELEVANT DETAIL.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:19 am

by shoh0ku » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:23 am
B cannot be correct because it talks about products, which are made out of old trees, decomposing. Irrelevant since the argument never talks about the products made from trees.

IMO E is correct.
The argument concludes that harvesting old trees will reduce carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. E weakens the argument by stating that young forests will take take many years to grown into the size of old forest, meaning more carbon dioxide will exist in atmosphere with greater young forests than old forests.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:19 am

by shoh0ku » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:25 am
B cannot be correct because it talks about products, which are made out of old trees, decomposing. Irrelevant since the argument never talks about the products made from trees.

IMO E is correct.
The argument concludes that harvesting old trees will reduce carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. E weakens the argument by stating that young forests will take take many years to grown into the size of old forest, meaning more carbon dioxide will exist in atmosphere with greater young forests than old forests.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:26 am
matt.lopz wrote:
Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?

(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.

(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.

(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.

(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.

(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.
ANSWER:

Premise 1: When large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide.

Additional Premise 2
: Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.

Conclusion: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Prove that: The amount of Carbon dioxide released in atmosphere does NOT reduce


(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed. OUT OF SCOPE.

(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly. CORRECT ANSWER!

(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species. IRRELEVANT DETAIL.

(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose. IRRELEVANT DETAIL.

(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests. IRRELEVANT DETAIL.
This is the nice explanation. OA is B

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:28 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by arorag » Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:22 pm
But how the organic matters help in reducing CO2???
help me to understand this.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:14 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Spring2009 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:46 pm
arorag wrote:But how the organic matters help in reducing CO2???
help me to understand this.
No, CO2 does not decrease because after organic matters decompose, they release CO2.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:33 am

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 3:17 pm
In my opinion B is the most logical one.