BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Usage of The proportion

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690
by gmatjeet » Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:16 am
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.
(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably


OA: C
Queries: In the OA "C", i dont understand the usage of "HAS" and "WHO".

1) The proportion of judges and partners is for sure going to be a number of people. How is it possible to consider this as singular.

2) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women -> Who acting as an essential modifier refers to the whole noun phrase before WHO. So then here WHO refers to Proportion of Judges and Partners. How is it that the proportion can be women?

Can some SC experts please help me with this.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 56 times

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:42 am
nice questions . where did u get this sc ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690

by gmatjeet » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:44 am
I suppose it is from OG diagonastic test.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 56 times

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:45 am
All Your Quests answered here by the great Lunarpower
https://www.beatthegmat.com/quantity-exp ... 32059.html
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:10 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:690

by gmatjeet » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:53 am
Thanks. I had seen this link and went through it in detail.
But unable to understand the concept. As the thread was quite old, i did not think it would attract a lot of attention, so opened a new thread.

If you understood Ron's explanation, could you answer my queries. I would be really thankfull.

TIA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 56 times

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:00 am
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.
(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

I think both of your queries have been answered very well by Ron . Ron says
Has the option C been
C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms , who are women has not risen comparably
who would have modified law firms .Same is the case with which modifier which is always preceded by a comma
But since there is no comma who can modify judges and partners . Same is the case with that modifier .
As for your second question ron says
had C been
C) a proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
then the number of verb would have depended on the object of preposition of .
Here judges is plural
But when it is the proportion , the number of verb is singular has
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times

by aspirant2011 » Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:48 am
gmatjeet wrote:Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.

(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

has is the verb which is used for proportion & whorefers to the end result of proportion of judges and partners
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 7:41 am
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:690

by fueledGMAT » Tue Nov 15, 2011 11:55 am
I am no GMAT expert, but I think I can explain why the answer is C:

Answer A is correct except it links Have and proportion. Since proportion is an uncountable noun, it must be singular.

Answer B creates a parallelism issue because it separates judges and partners, indicating that partners may not need to be female

Answer C corrects the subject/verb agreement by changing the have to has. Thus this is the correct answer.

Answer D makes the same mistake that answer B makes. It also adds yet, which is redundant to despite.

Answer E adds yet, which is redundant to despite and therefore not necessary.

Hope this helps!
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." ~ Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times

by aspirant2011 » Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:10 am
gmatjeet wrote:Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.
(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably


OA: C
Queries: In the OA "C", i dont understand the usage of "HAS" and "WHO".

1) The proportion of judges and partners is for sure going to be a number of people. How is it possible to consider this as singular.

2) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women -> Who acting as an essential modifier refers to the whole noun phrase before WHO. So then here WHO refers to Proportion of Judges and Partners. How is it that the proportion can be women?

Can some SC experts please help me with this.
We have used has because subject is singular i.e proportion..... This is a case of prepositional modifier
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:47 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by ArunangsuSahu » Sat Jan 14, 2012 10:45 am
(C)

The proportion---has

and concise
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:55 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by veenu08 » Wed May 08, 2013 10:14 am
Can some one please explain the usage of yet

Regards,
Veenu
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:53 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by jack.daniel » Fri May 17, 2013 4:53 am
veenu08 wrote:Can some one please explain the usage of yet

Regards,
Veenu
in option D and E, YET is used to show contrast. This causes redundancy (double conjunction), because DESPITE, which is also used to show contrast, already exists in the sentence.

Following double conjunction patterns cause Redundancy:
1. Though/although/even though/despite/in spite of FOLLOWED BY but/yet/however/still/nevertheless
2. because/since/due to/as FOLLOWED BY so/therefore/thus/consequently

Hope this will clear you why D and E are ruled out.

Thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1