BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Question from MBA.com preptest 2

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:19 pm
yeah right :-) Thanks
Testluv wrote:
"Herbicides allow cereal crops to be grown very efficiently, with virtually no competition from weeds."
Yeah, so the way herbicides allow crops to grow is by killing off surrounding weeds that compete for resources (such as sunlight, soil nutrients, etc). In CR, you are not expected to use outside knowledge but they will expect you have to have good vocabulary. Knowing that herbicides kill plants helps us to understand that sentence. (We know "cide" means kill as in "homicidal" or "suicidal".)

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:44 pm
:lol:
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:37 pm
Here in this argument, environmentalist says A caused B.But Author says A doesn't cause B.

Now we have been asked to "weaken" Author's stand.

So how do we do that???

One way i s to show that : Boss, A causes C & inturn C causes B which altogether means A has "some" indirect effect on B.

This pattern is depicted in Option A

Here A: Herbicides, B: Death of Chicks C:Decrease in weed population on which the birds feed up on.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:50 pm
I will Go with option D in this case.