BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities - 1

Expert replies
by bubbliiiiiiii » Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:21 am
If p is an integer greater than zero, is 200 < sqrt(p)?

198 < sqrt(p-2)
202 < sqrt(p+2)

[spoiler]OA: B[/spoiler]

Looking for explanations and alternative approaches.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by HSPA » Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:26 am
198^2+2 cannot reach 200^2...
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by manpsingh87 » Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:44 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:If p is an integer greater than zero, is 200 < sqrt(p)?

198 < sqrt(p-2)
202 < sqrt(p+2)

[spoiler]OA: B[/spoiler]

Looking for explanations and alternative approaches.
1) 198<sqrt(p-2); when p= 40002, then p-2=40002-2=40000 therefore sqrt(40000)=200
198<200, also 200<sqrt(40002);

now consider p=199^2, then p-2=199^2-2 will be greater than 198 but 200<199 is not true,
as here different answers are possible for different values of p hence a alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

2)202<sqrt(p+2); now the minimum value of p=202^2, for which this inequality will be true,
also 200<202, is true, therefore 2 alone is sufficient to answer the question hence B..!!
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:58 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:If p is an integer greater than zero, is 200 < sqrt(p)?

198 < sqrt(p-2)
202 < sqrt(p+2)

[spoiler]OA: B[/spoiler]

Looking for explanations and alternative approaches.
I'd get rid of the roots first, since they're likely to be confusing (we can square both sides of an inequality if we know both sides are positive, which is the case here). The question asks if p > 200^2.

Statement 1 tells us that p-2 > 198^2, or that p > 198^2 + 2. Now, 198^2 + 2 is only slightly greater than 198^2, so is certainly less than 200^2, so we don't know whether p is greater than 200^2.

Statement 2 tells us that p+2 > 202^2, or that p > 202^2 - 2. Now 202^2 - 2 is only slightly less than 202^2, so is certainly more than 200^2, and Statement 2 is sufficient.

In evaluating each statement, I've made use of the fact that the distance between 198^2 and 200^2 is greater than 2, and the distance between 200^2 and 202^2 is greater than 2. If you need to, you can use the difference of squares to work out just how far apart those numbers actually are: 200^2 - 198^2 = (200 + 198)(200 - 198) = 398*2 = 796. You can do the same for 202^2 - 200^2.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion