triangle

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1022
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:49 pm
Location: Gandhinagar
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:2 members

triangle

by shashank.ism » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:55 pm
Through T, the mid-point of the side QR of a triangle PQR, a straight line is to meet PQ produced to S and PR at U, so that PU = PS. If the length of UR = 2 cm, then the length of QS is

3/2 cm
7/2 cm
5/2 cm
3 cm
2 cm
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:45 am
shashank.ism wrote:Through T, the mid-point of the side QR of a triangle PQR, a straight line is to meet PQ produced to S and PR at U, so that PU = PS. If the length of UR = 2 cm, then the length of QS is

3/2 cm
7/2 cm
5/2 cm
3 cm
2 cm
If <PSU = <PUS =Q , in triangle UTR the sine of < opposite to UR and TR is the same as
sine of < opposite to QS and QT in triangle QST correspondingly.Since , TR=QT =>QS=UR=2


User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:34 am
komal wrote:
shashank.ism wrote:Through T, the mid-point of the side QR of a triangle PQR, a straight line is to meet PQ produced to S and PR at U, so that PU = PS. If the length of UR = 2 cm, then the length of QS is

3/2 cm
7/2 cm
5/2 cm
3 cm
2 cm
If <PSU = <PUS =Q , in triangle UTR the sine of < opposite to UR and TR is the same as
sine of < opposite to QS and QT in triangle QST correspondingly.Since , TR=QT =>QS=UR=2

My doubt is:-Since QS is extended line of PQ wouldn't the length of QS be greater than that of PQ which would be greater than 2??

Also,I didn't understand how
sine of < opposite to UR and TR is the same as
sine of < opposite to QS

Can you show it with a diagram ??It seems very confusing from the interpretation diagram I have drawn.
Thanks in advance.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Thu Feb 18, 2010 2:43 am
My doubt is:-Since QS is extended line of PQ wouldn't the length of QS be greater than that of PQ which would be greater than 2??

Also,I didn't understand how
sine of < opposite to UR and TR is the same as
sine of < opposite to QS

Can you show it with a diagram ??It seems very confusing from the interpretation diagram I have drawn.
Thanks in advance.[/quote]


PS.QT.UR = QS.TR.PU
as PS = PU and QT = TR
we have UR = QS
so QS = 2.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:46 am
komal wrote:My doubt is:-Since QS is extended line of PQ wouldn't the length of QS be greater than that of PQ which would be greater than 2??

Also,I didn't understand how
sine of < opposite to UR and TR is the same as
sine of < opposite to QS

Can you show it with a diagram ??It seems very confusing from the interpretation diagram I have drawn.
Thanks in advance.

PS.QT.UR = QS.TR.PU
as PS = PU and QT = TR
we have UR = QS
so QS = 2.
[/quote]

Thanks.Now,I get it.
PS.QT.UR = QS.TR.PU
This was one of the formulas I had learnt in my 9th grade.
The main problem is I don't remember them when there is a need to apply the formulae.
A further problem is that when you have memorized too many formulas it doesn't click which one to use in what problem and it gets all messes up.[Don't most GMAT instructions advise to refrain from learning too many formulas??]
Guess the only panacea is practice.
Have you learnt all these formulas form practice or have you memorized them??Just asking.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P