BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

1000 sc test18#7

Expert replies
by magical cook » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:51 pm
Hi,

I thought the answer was E) but turned out to be A) -- why E) is better??


Consumers in California seeking personal loans have fewer banks to turn to than do consumers elsewhere in the United States. This shortage of competition among banks explains why interest rates on personal loans in California are higher than in any other region of the United States.
Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the conclusion above?
(A) Because of the comparatively high wages they must pay to attract qualified workers, California banks charge depositors more than banks elsewhere do for many of the services they offer.
(B) Personal loans are riskier than other types of loans, such as home mortgage loans, that banks make.
(C) Since bank deposits in California are covered by the same type of insurance that guarantees bank deposits in other parts of the United States, they are no less secure than deposits elsewhere.
(D) The proportion of consumers who default on their personal loans is lower in California than in any other region of the United States.
(E) Interest rates paid by California banks to depositors are lower than those paid by banks in other parts of the United States because in California there is less competition to attract depositors.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Cybermusings » Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:23 am
The answer should be A...

We have to choose an option which refutes the fact that lack of competition is responsible for high interest rates on personal loans. Choice E if true, would highlight that competition does affect the interest rates doled out by banks. Hence instead of weakening the claim made by the author it would substantiate/strengthen it.

Hence A has to be correct
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Mon Apr 18, 2016 3:44 am
I agree that answer should be A.
Join the discussion