BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

conclude to or conclude with

Expert replies
by nitika22 » Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:54 am
Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government’s being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

A. by the United States government’s being satisfied, to impose
B. by the United States government’s satisfaction, impose
C. with the United States government’s being satisfied, imposing
D. to the United States government’s satisfaction, impose
E. to the United States government’s satisfaction, imposing


What is the correct idiom with 'conclude' ?
conclude with or conclude to?
somebody please enligthen me
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sacx » Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:09 am
'Conclude to' is used with a verb

like in the above example - conclude to United state's satisfaction

since satisfaction is a verb we use 'conclude to'

'conclude with' is used with a noun

eg: Conclude with United States
since United States is a noun we use 'conclude with'
SACX
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:52 am
sacx wrote: since satisfaction is a verb we use 'conclude to'
‘Satisfaction’ is not a verb.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:13 am
nitika22 wrote:Section 301 of the 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act enables the United States Trade Representative to single out a country as an unfair trader, begin trade negotiations with that country, and, if the negotiations do not conclude by the United States government’s being satisfied, to impose sanctions.

A. by the United States government’s being satisfied, to impose
B. by the United States government’s satisfaction, impose
C. with the United States government’s being satisfied, imposing
D. to the United States government’s satisfaction, impose
E. to the United States government’s satisfaction, imposing


What is the correct idiom with 'conclude' ?
conclude with or conclude to?
somebody please enligthen me
First read gives us a signal that it’s a parallelism issue: ‘single out’, ‘begin trade’ and some simple verb. Only valid options are B and D. In option B, “Conclude by the US government…,” sounds like government itself is concluding, and that’s logically wrong. IMO D, which says USTR can impose sanctions, if the negotiations do not conclude to the US government’s satisfaction.

I am confused whether “confused with” is idiomatic. To me conclude to, with or by all looks correct depending on the context.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:21 am
the idiom is "to satisfaction".

to maintain parallelism we need: enable to single, begin trade and impose
so A, C, E are out. there goes "conclude with" as well.

between B and D. its D.
"to someones satisfaction" is better usage than "by someones satisfaction" as US's satisfaction itself coudnt have performed the act of conclusion.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:25 am
karmayogi wrote: To me conclude to, with or by all looks correct depending on the context.
agree with karmayogi
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1