Principal Tenets of a Political party

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

Principal Tenets of a Political party

by komal » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:30 am
A political candidate committed to the principal tenets of a political party may not always explain the implications of his or her party commitment to the voters in full detail. Adele Richardson, for example, is a minor-party candidate in contention for a seat on the school board. She is not likely to inform conservative voters in her district that the national leadership of her party has recently recommended that school curricula be more closely monitored by agencies of the federal government.

Each of the following is assumed in the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) A political candidate is likely to be more interested in winning an election than in proselytizing the electorate.

(B) The candidate of any party is likely to support the policy decisions made by the national leadership.

(C) All candidates for such community positions as membership on the school board must have commitments to national parties.

(D) Conservatives in Adele Richardson's district do not support federal intervention in decisions made by community school officials.

(E) Voters in Adele Richardson's district are not fully aware of the policy statements made by the national leadership of her party

OA : C source : kaplan 800
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pm
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times
Followed by:2 members

by ajith » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:55 am
"All candidates for such community positions as membership on the school board must have commitments to national parties"

C is the obvious choice since the passage does not assume this statement or make use of such an unstated assumption.
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.

Legendary Member
Posts: 941
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:28 am
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:1 members

by bhumika.k.shah » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:47 pm
i was confused between C and D
whats wrong with D ?

I think Its not D coz if D wasn't true then Adele would have said about her party's recommendation.

Hence i'd go with C

i wanna know is my reasoning right for eliminating D ??

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:19 pm
bhumika.k.shah wrote:i was confused between C and D
whats wrong with D ?

I think Its not D coz if D wasn't true then Adele would have said about her party's recommendation.

Hence i'd go with C

i wanna know is my reasoning right for eliminating D ??
(D) is a fairly obvious assumption: Why would Richardson conceal her party's recommendation from conservatives if conservatives supported it? Instead, she'd be more likely to parade the party recommendation in order to garner conservative votes.

Hope this helps : )