BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

confused one

Expert replies
by hakyology » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:15 am
On a Saturday night, each of the rooms at a certain motel was rented for either $40 or $60. If 10 of the rooms that were rented for $60 had instead been rented for $40, then the total rent the motel charged for that night would have been reduced by 25 percent. What was the totla rent the motel actually charged for that night?

A)$600
B)$800
C)$1,000
D)$1,600
E)$2,400


Please explain.

The answer is B.

I got $850 where it is not there among the answer choices.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sethids » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:26 am
x = No. of rooms rented for $40
y = No. of rooms rented for $60

We need to find the value of 40x + 60y which is the total value of the rooms rented on the particular night.

deducing the equation from given information:
(40x + 60y)*3/4 = 40(x + 10) + 60(y - 10)
=> 120x + 180y = 160x + 1600 + 240y - 2400

simplifying on both sides we get:
40x + 60y = 800.

Hence B is the answer.
Join the discussion

by kanak » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:34 am
Yes. The ans is B. Here's how:

Let there be x other rooms apart from the 10 rooms.

10 rooms @ $60 = $600
Rest of the rooms (i.e., x) @ $40 = 40x

600 + 40x is the cost.

If 10 rooms had $40 as rent = $400
Rest of the rooms = 40x

400 + 40x is the alternative cost.

600 + 40x = T
400 + 40x = (3/4) T

solve for T and you'll get
T = 800.
Join the discussion

by hakyology » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:36 am
hm...i do not get that. could you explain further? thanks.
Join the discussion

=

by Robertogmat » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:11 pm
hakyology wrote:hm...i do not get that. could you explain further? thanks.
another way to solve it:

If the hotel had rented the 10 rooms for Usd 40 instead of usd 60, it would have lost USd 20 * 10 rooms = Usd200

Usd 200 corresponds to the reduction of 25%.
therefore:

0.25x=200
x=800
Join the discussion

by amitdgr » Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:40 am
To find => total cost = x

"If 10 of the rooms that were rented for $60 had instead been rented for $40"

i.e. instead of charging 60*10 for ten rooms, if they had charged 40*10

"then the total rent the motel charged for that night would have been reduced by 25 percent"

i.e. the rent lost = (60*10) - (40*10) = 200 is actually 25% of x

put into equation , 200 = 0.25x

=> x= USD 800

HTH

Amit
Join the discussion

Re: confused one

by amitdgr » Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:32 am
hakyology wrote:
I got $850 where it is not there among the answer choices.
Can you explain the method you tried ? So that we can find out where you went wrong. Might help us to avoid any such mistake in the future.


Amit
Join the discussion

by AleksandrM » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:50 am
Hey, how come you can't solve this problem using the following equation?

(40y + 600) - (40y + 400)/ 40y + 600 = .25

You would end up with y = 35

Then you had a rent of 40(35) + 600 = 2000

But instead you had 40(35) + 400 = 1800
Join the discussion

by AleksandrM » Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:55 am
Never mind. I see my mistake. Instead of making the first figure R for total rent and second 3/4R for the reduced rent, I made them both R.
Join the discussion