BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities problem

Expert replies
by joannabanana » Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:24 am
If -2<a<11 and 3<b<12, then which of the following is NOT true?
(A) 1<a+b<23
(B) -14<a-b<8
(C) -7<b-a<14
(D) 1<b+a<23
(E) -24<ab<132

I know what the answer is, but I don't quite get how to go about solving this.
Any tips on the quickest way to solve it?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by shaw3257 » Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:06 am
joannabanana wrote:If -2<a<11 and 3<b<12, then which of the following is NOT true?
(A) 1<a+b<23
(B) -14<a-b<8
(C) -7<b-a<14
(D) 1<b+a<23
(E) -24<ab<132

I know what the answer is, but I don't quite get how to go about solving this.
Any tips on the quickest way to solve it?
I'm afraid it comes down to just going through each choice and plugging numbers into them. However, in this problem, a good starting point be to notice that choices A and D are identical, therefore the answer can't be A or D (there can't be two right answers : p) So you'll be left with only three options to evaluate which shouldn't take you more than two minutes to go through.
Join the discussion

by scorpionz » Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:13 am
joannabanana wrote:If -2<a<11 and 3<b<12, then which of the following is NOT true?
(A) 1<a+b<23
(B) -14<a-b<8
(C) -7<b-a<14
(D) 1<b+a<23
(E) -24<ab<132

I know what the answer is, but I don't quite get how to go about solving this.
Any tips on the quickest way to solve it?
The way I solved this problem is to jot down the two positive equalities (given) and their corresponding negative inequalities and then simply add them up..

-2 < a < 11 (given) ---------------------------------------------> 1
-11< -a < 2 (corresponding -ve inequality) -----------------> 2

3 < b < 12 (given) -----------------------------------------------> 3
-12 < -b < -3 (corresponding -ve inequality) ---------------> 4

So now we have 4 inequalities to deal with..Just add them as per the options..

Options A & D are actually the same and the easiest. Simply add 1 & 3 above and you get
1< a+b < 23 . Hence this is correct.

Option B. Here you need a-b, hence add 1 and 4. You will get
-14 < a-b < 8. Matches and hence correct.

Option C. Here you need b-a, hence add 2 and 3. You will get
-8 < b-a < 14. This does not match and is also not a subset of the range given in option (-7 to 14). Hence this is the incorrect option and thus the answer for this question.

Option E. Here you need ab, hence multiply 1 & 3. You will get
-6< ab < 132. Since this is a subset of the range (-24 to 132), this option is also correct.

This took some time to type, but it didn't take much time to solve..

Not sure if this is the quickest approach but works for me!! How did you approach this question?
Join the discussion

by joannabanana » Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:08 pm
I really like your answer scorpion, thanks!

And I know what my problem was: for (C) or "b-a" I got 5 < b-a < 1
by doing:
3-(-2) < b-a < 12-11
I now know that I need to rewrite -2<a<11 to -11<-a<2 but I still don't completely get why I have to multiply the "a" inequality first instead of just subtracting it... Though as I'm writing this I think it's starting to make more sense, but maybe you can still shed some light :)
Join the discussion

by scorpionz » Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:03 pm
joannabanana wrote:I really like your answer scorpion, thanks!

And I know what my problem was: for (C) or "b-a" I got 5 < b-a < 1
by doing:
3-(-2) < b-a < 12-11
I now know that I need to rewrite -2<a<11 to -11<-a<2 but I still don't completely get why I have to multiply the "a" inequality first instead of just subtracting it... Though as I'm writing this I think it's starting to make more sense, but maybe you can still shed some light :)
No problem..

The thumb-rule for inequalities is that the inequalities signs (<,>,=) change when multiplied by -1.

Example: 1 < x < 5
Say x=2: 1 < 2 < 5 - Correct

Now if I want to rewrite the above inequality for -2 (-x), if I don't change the inequality sign, it would look like -
-1 < -2 < -5
This is illogical since we know that -5 is less than -2 which is in turn less than -1. Hence the inequality sign must be changed to make it sensible.
-1 > -2 > -5
or
-5 < -2 < -1 - This makes perfect sense.

In the b-a illustration here, you finally got 5 < b-a < 1, which doesn't make sense in this context.

If all else fails,
a. try to plug in numbers
b. visualize the inequality on the number line

In this case the 5 < b-a < 1 inequality represents a range of numbers on the number line which are all less than 1 or all greater than 5. Not to say that this cannot happen but in this context it is not correct. In situations where that is really the intent, the inequality would have to be written as two separate inequalities i.e. b-a < 1 AND b-a > 5
Join the discussion

by joannabanana » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:08 am
Great, thank you! I think I just need to be more careful and look at whether what I've written down, as you said, makes sense!
Join the discussion