BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PS Inequalities

Expert replies

by gauravgundal » Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:10 am
Posted: Jul Jul 13, 2010 6:08

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
I am little confused : The OG says that the answer is D .
if 2 . cannot be true then how the answer D is correct .Please explain me
GMAT Quantitative Review PS 156
Looks like Ian did something wrong at the end. (2 is definitely a MUST BE TRUE.)

But his approach is still good. |x+3| can be rewritten as |x-(-3)|, which means "the distance between x and -3 on the number line."

IF x<-5, IS the distance between x and -3 on the number line >2 ?
Clearly, yes (look at it on the number line). Thus, 2 must be true.

But the easiest way BY FAR, here, is to pick numbers as Stuart said, and as I showed in my post above:


Quote:
If you plug any number that satisfies this inequality into |x+3|, you will see that the result must be >2. For example, let x=-6. Then, |-6+3| = 3. Is 3>2? Yes. Let x=-5.1. Then, |-5.1+3| = 2.1. Is 2.1>2? Yes. We've convinced ourselves that given x<-5, roman numeral 2 must be true.
.
A third way of seeing this is to use algebra and a just a wee bit of formal logic (such a "wee" bit of formal logic, that you can even call it commonsense):

|x+3|>2

solves to :
x<-5 OR x>-1

For 2 to be necessarily true, one of these two inequalities must hold true (it's impossible for both of them to hold true simultaneously). So, you can read 2 as:

If x not <-5, then x>-1
and:
If x not >-1, then x<-5.

Because x<-5, we know that x is not>-1.
And we know from the above that if x is not >-1, then x<-5.
So, we are left with the quaint question: If x<-5, does it have to be true that x<-5?
Clearly, yes.
Thus, 2 must be true.
The above is confusing for me ,but I think I am clear about my doubt..

Basically question stems itself say that x<-5 ;
and |x+3|>2
satifies for x<-5
so this is must be true..

so ,I hope I am right :)
But thanks everyone .
Thanks to all tutors for their efforts.Tutor come here and help us .This is very important for us. :)
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:36 am
yes, you are right!

and what I meant by the above is just that one of those 2 inequalities must hold true. So, if one doesn't hold, then the other must.

If x<-5, then we know that x>-1 doesn't hold. Thus, the other one must hold: x<-5.

Cheers!

:)
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion