NYTimes -- use of past perfect 'had' ?

Expert replies

sui generis: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 89; Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 1 times

by sui generis » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:53 am

For decades, government officials had blamed rural apathy for India's high illiteracy rates, saying that families preferred sending their children into the fields, not the classroom.

Got this excerpt form nytimes*. I am not able to understand why past perfect 'had blamed' is used at first place followed by simple past 'preferred' ?

Anyone please shed some light. Thanks.

*Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/31/world ... &ref=world

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:53 am

chris@magoosh: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 88; Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:01 pmFollowed by: 37 members; Thanked: 54 times

by chris@magoosh » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:38 pm

The New York Times - always a great resource for honing your SC skills

.

In this case, we have the past perfect. Notice that the sentence begins with 'For decades..."

That is, for decades - say from 1970 - 2000 - the government had blamed. Meaning that it is no longer blaming rural apathy. It now probably cites some other factor for the high illiteracy rate, such as lack of educational opportunities. But for a period in the past it had been doing something. Therefore we want past perfect.

Now for the next verb - preferred.

During the time period that the government had blamed, it gave a reason for the high illiteracy rates: families preferred X. We want simple past because, during the decades that the government blamed illiteracy on rural apathy, families preferred X.

Had the sentence read: "saying that families had preferred..." then the government, during the decades it was making this claim, would be implying that at some past time period - say from 1950 - 1960 - families preferred X.

I hope that makes sense

Like this post

sui generis: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 89; Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 1 times

by sui generis » Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:52 pm

Thanks Chris for the explanation. However, I have a doubt regarding usage of past perfect. I believe the usage of 'past perfect' such sentences is optional i.e. simple past would also do the job.

Below are two sentences from NYT conforming to above mentioned rule of optional usage:

For decades, the government had banned real estate sales and kept a jealous grip on construction.
Source: https://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/inte ... index.html

For decades, the government banned real estate sales and kept a jealous grip on construction.
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/16/world ... wanted=all

Please confirm this understanding ? Thanks

Like this post

killer1387: Legendary Member; Posts: 581; Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 amFollowed by: 5 members; Thanked: 52 times

by killer1387 » Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:00 am

these two sentences intend to take different stands with concern to meanings. grammatically both are fine.

Like this post

sui generis: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 89; Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 1 times

by sui generis » Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:32 am

@killer1387: I didn't really get the two implicit meaning you are referring to. Could you please elaborate on the two different meaning ?

Additionally, I came across another sentence from NYT.

Mr. Khade's elder brother, Datta, had managed to get an apprenticeship as a welder at a government-owned ship building company, Mazagon Dock, in Mumbai. He persuaded young Ashok to move to the big city.

Again, first the author used 'had managed' followed by simple past 'persuaded' in the next sentence. Any explanations for this ? Is it somehow written inÂ passive voice ? Experts please help ?

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/22/world ... wanted=all

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:58 am

SG, read this post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pos ... tml#p58397

sui generis wrote:Additionally, I came across another sentence from NYT.

Mr. Khade's elder brother, Datta, had managed to get an apprenticeship as a welder at a government-owned ship building company, Mazagon Dock, in Mumbai. He persuaded young Ashok to move to the big city.

Again, first the author used 'had managed' followed by simple past 'persuaded' in the next sentence. Any explanations for this ? Is it somehow written inÂ passive voice ? Experts please help ?

"X had managed to get an apprenticeship..." is something that was completed by the time of the other action (the attempt at persuasion). so, the past perfect signals this sense of completion.
this comment should make more sense after you read through the post linked above.

also, you may want to review what "passive voice" means; your question above shows a lack of understanding of that term. (no verbs in the sentence above are passive; that would be "X was persuaded", etc.)
if you need to review first principles, just google "english passive voice" and read through the examples in the first few page hits.

Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions Ã Ron en franÃ§ais
Voit esittÃ¤Ã¤ kysymyksiÃ¤ Ron:lle myÃ¶s suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vÃªtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vÃªtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Like this post

sui generis: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 89; Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 1 times

by sui generis » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:03 am

Thanks for replying, Ron.

Mr. Khade's elder brother, Datta, had managed to get an apprenticeship as a welder at a government-owned ship building company, Mazagon Dock, in Mumbai. He persuaded young Ashok to move to the big city.
"X had managed to get an apprenticeship..." is something that was completed by the time of the other action (the attempt at persuasion). so, the past perfect signals this sense of completion.

I thought those two sentences are independent as they are separated by period. But had there been first statement only, would past perfect still be used ?
X had managed to get an apprenticeship as a welder at a Mazagon Dock. Is this sentence correct or simple past is needed ?

Like this post

sui generis: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 89; Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 1 times

by sui generis » Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:08 am

For decades, the government had banned real estate sales and kept a jealous grip on construction. Materials were scarce, red tape endless and inspectors meddlesome. Black marketeers would deliver cinder blocks by cover of darkness, and purchasing a bag of sand was a furtive process akin to buying drugs.
Source: https://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/inte ... index.html

For decades, the government banned real estate sales and kept a jealous grip on construction. Materials were scarce, red tape endless and inspectors meddlesome. Black marketeers would deliver cinder blocks by cover of darkness, and purchasing a bag of sand was a furtive process akin to buying drugs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/16/world ... wanted=all

Furthermore, do the aforementioned two sentences have different meanings ? If yes, could you please explain what would they be ?

Thanks

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:53 am

sui generis wrote:I thought those two sentences are independent as they are separated by period. But had there been first statement only, would past perfect still be used ?
X had managed to get an apprenticeship as a welder at a Mazagon Dock. Is this sentence correct or simple past is needed ?

verb tenses are determined entirely by context. if you take away all of the surrounding context, then, in many (if not most) instances, you can't designate a single correct tense.

if this sentence is completely by itself, then it will make sense in almost any tense at all -- as is the case for just about any simple enough sentence. viz.:
i teach high school
i had taught high school
i have taught high school
i will teach high school
i taught high school
all of these could potentially make sense, given the right context.

when verb tenses are tested on GMAC SC's (less commonly than you might think -- verb tense is not a major topic), you will notice that the sentences always contain enough time and/or context clues to give meaningful input into the tense selection.

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:56 am

sui generis wrote:For decades, the government had banned real estate sales and kept a jealous grip on construction.

this one would make sense if the article goes on to describe the situation after the ban was lifted.
if the situation is viewed from the standpoint of that time period -- i.e., from a point in the past after the removal of the ban -- then this tense works.

For decades, the government banned real estate sales and kept a jealous grip on construction.

if the article is simply narrating what the situation was like at the time -- and not describing the situation from a point of view situated after the removal of the ban -- then, as in other direct narrations of past events, the past tense works.

Like this post

sui generis: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 89; Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 amFollowed by: 2 members; Thanked: 1 times

by sui generis » Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:44 am

Thanks a lot again, Ron. Perfectly makes sense.

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:54 am

you're welcome.

Like this post

Post new topic Locked

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

559 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review