BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Unable to understand the solution, kindly explain

Expert replies
by sabiha » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:18 am
If it is true that -6 < equal to n < equal to 10, which of the following must be true?

A. n < 8

B. n = -6

C. n > -8

D. -10 < n < 7

E. none of the above


The correct choice is C i.e. n > -8.

I am unable to understand this coz if n > -8, then n = -7, -6...
It is not any where mentioned in the stem that n = -7 whereas n has all the values from -6 to 10.

Kindly explain.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sk818020 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:27 am
According to the parameters -6<n<10.

Any number in that particular set will be greater than any number less than -6. Thus, if in must be in this particular range, then n will always be greater than any number less than -6. You can conclude that C is the correct answer.

"It is not any where mentioned in the stem that n = -7 whereas n has all the values from -6 to 10."

The question stem specifically mentions that n is not equal to -7, but that doesn't change the fact that because n is greater than or equal to -6 and less than or equal to 10, it must also always be greater than -8 because n must exist in the given range.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,

Jared
Join the discussion

by Rich@VeritasPrep » Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:50 am
Nice explanation Jared.

To that I would add the following...

There's a difference between saying "n > -8 must be true" and "n > -8 is the range of all possible values of n". I think that's where the confusion is coming from.

We're not saying that all possible values of n > -8 fit the inequality given in the prompt. We're just saying that no matter what value of n we pick from -6<=n<=10, it will DEFINITELY be greater than -8.

Another example:

If we say that the value of x is positive, then it is definitely true that x > -10, because any positive number is bigger than a negative number. We're not saying that x can be ANY value greater than -10; we're just saying it is definitely greater than -10.

Hopefully that makes sense!
Rich Zwelling
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
Join the discussion

by sabiha » Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:24 am
Thanks for explaining the difference.

I have another question.

This one was with a diagram, where A,B,C,D,E are 5 points on the number line for -2,-1,0,1, 2 respectively. The question asks which of these points has highest absolute value?
The answer is A (-2)

But my question here is that isn't it that both -2 and 2 have the same absolute values? How can we distinguish between the absolute values of a positive and negative of the same no.?

Thanks in advance
raz1024 wrote:Nice explanation Jared.

To that I would add the following...

There's a difference between saying "n > -8 must be true" and "n > -8 is the range of all possible values of n". I think that's where the confusion is coming from.

We're not saying that all possible values of n > -8 fit the inequality given in the prompt. We're just saying that no matter what value of n we pick from -6<=n<=10, it will DEFINITELY be greater than -8.

Another example:

If we say that the value of x is positive, then it is definitely true that x > -10, because any positive number is bigger than a negative number. We're not saying that x can be ANY value greater than -10; we're just saying it is definitely greater than -10.

Hopefully that makes sense!
Join the discussion

by amising6 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:43 am
sabiha wrote:Thanks for explaining the difference.

I have another question.

This one was with a diagram, where A,B,C,D,E are 5 points on the number line for -2,-1,0,1, 2 respectively. The question asks which of these points has highest absolute value?
The answer is A (-2)

But my question here is that isn't it that both -2 and 2 have the same absolute values? How can we distinguish between the absolute values of a positive and negative of the same no.?

Thanks in advance
raz1024 wrote:Nice explanation Jared.



To that I would add the following...

There's a difference between saying "n > -8 must be true" and "n > -8 is the range of all possible values of n". I think that's where the confusion is coming from.

We're not saying that all possible values of n > -8 fit the inequality given in the prompt. We're just saying that no matter what value of n we pick from -6<=n<=10, it will DEFINITELY be greater than -8.

Another example:

If we say that the value of x is positive, then it is definitely true that x > -10, because any positive number is bigger than a negative number. We're not saying that x can be ANY value greater than -10; we're just saying it is definitely greater than -10.

Hopefully that makes sense!



ye you are right the absolut value will be 2
Ideation without execution is delusion
Join the discussion

by sabiha » Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:22 am
amising6 wrote:
sabiha wrote:Thanks for explaining the difference.

I have another question.

This one was with a diagram, where A,B,C,D,E are 5 points on the number line for -2,-1,0,1, 2 respectively. The question asks which of these points has highest absolute value?
The answer is A (-2)

But my question here is that isn't it that both -2 and 2 have the same absolute values? How can we distinguish between the absolute values of a positive and negative of the same no.?

Thanks in advance
raz1024 wrote:Nice explanation Jared.



To that I would add the following...

There's a difference between saying "n > -8 must be true" and "n > -8 is the range of all possible values of n". I think that's where the confusion is coming from.

We're not saying that all possible values of n > -8 fit the inequality given in the prompt. We're just saying that no matter what value of n we pick from -6<=n<=10, it will DEFINITELY be greater than -8.

Another example:

If we say that the value of x is positive, then it is definitely true that x > -10, because any positive number is bigger than a negative number. We're not saying that x can be ANY value greater than -10; we're just saying it is definitely greater than -10.

Hopefully that makes sense!



ye you are right the absolut value will be 2
yes that is right, but the question asked is which of the points has highest absolute value and the answer is -2.
I don't understand how can they distinguish between the absolute value of 2 and -2?
Join the discussion

by singhpreet1 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:48 am
sabiha wrote:If it is true that -6 < equal to n < equal to 10, which of the following must be true?

A. n < 8

B. n = -6

C. n > -8

D. -10 < n < 7

E. none of the above


The correct choice is C i.e. n > -8.

I am unable to understand this coz if n > -8, then n = -7, -6...
It is not any where mentioned in the stem that n = -7 whereas n has all the values from -6 to 10.

Kindly explain.
really sorry to reopen this discussion but i still dont understand why we cant choose B, which is the ideal option as per the information given: -6 < equal to n < equal to 10, we know for sure that n could be -6, for n > -8 it could be-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 but there is no certainty of the value, though we know it does fulfill the condition as does answer choice B. i would really appreciate a expert opinion on this problem to clarify this to me.

thanks a ton.
Preet
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:54 pm
Hi preet,

if the question asked for what COULD be true, then you would be correct.

But the question asks for what MUST be true. It doesn't HAVE to be true that n = -6.

However, it must be true that any value within the range of -6 to 10 (inclusive) is larger than -8.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by sabiha » Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:06 pm
Could you please also explain the question below:


This one was with a diagram, where A,B,C,D,E are 5 points on the number line for -2,-1,0,1, 2 respectively. The question asks which of these points has highest absolute value?
The answer is A (-2)

But my question here is that isn't it that both -2 and 2 have the same absolute values? How can we distinguish between the absolute values of a positive and negative of the same no.?

Testluv wrote:Hi preet,

if the question asked for what COULD be true, then you would be correct.

But the question asks for what MUST be true. It doesn't HAVE to be true that n = -6.

However, it must be true that any value within the range of -6 to 10 (inclusive) is larger than -8.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:15 am
I know the question you are referring to. In some early printings of the OG, E is above "2". But in later printings it is before "2". (I mean printings not editions).

Rest easy. You've encountered a rare thing indeed: a typo in the OG.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion