My question basically refers to the usage of nominative case vs the objective case
According to the rule;
A nominative case should be used as the complement of the verb to be when to be has no subject
for example
It is I
To be she would be a hardhip
They need the quarterback to be he who has a cool head and a strong throwing arm
and a objective case should be used as the complement of the verb to when to be has a subject
for example
What I wouldnt give to be her
I am thoroughly confused at this point withthe usage of nominative vs objective in "to be" especially the last example.
also
This is the man (who / that/whom) I wanted to speak to and whose name I'd forgotten
According to the rule;
A nominative case should be used as the complement of the verb to be when to be has no subject
for example
It is I
To be she would be a hardhip
They need the quarterback to be he who has a cool head and a strong throwing arm
and a objective case should be used as the complement of the verb to when to be has a subject
for example
What I wouldnt give to be her
I am thoroughly confused at this point withthe usage of nominative vs objective in "to be" especially the last example.
also
This is the man (who / that/whom) I wanted to speak to and whose name I'd forgotten
















