BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Melting cube!

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:7 members

Melting cube!

by vinay1983 » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:54 am
A large cube is formed from the material obtained by melting 3 cubes of sides 3 units, 4 units and 5 units. What is the ration of the sum of the total surface area of the small cubes to that of the large cubes?

A. 1:1
B. 12:7
C. 25:18
D. 12:13
E. 12:17
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:07 am
vinay1983 wrote:A large cube is formed from the material obtained by melting 3 cubes of sides 3 units, 4 units and 5 units. What is the ration of the sum of the total surface area of the small cubes to that of the large cube?

A. 1:1
B. 12:7
C. 25:18
D. 12:13
E. 12:17
Total volume of all 3 cubes
(3x3x3) + (4x4x4) + (5x5x5) = 27 + 64 + 125 = 216
So, the NEW cube must have volume of 216 cubic units
If we let k be length of one side of NEW cube, then we know that k^3 = 216
Solve, to get k = 6
So, the NEW cube has dimensions 6x6x6

Total surface of the 3 original cubes
6(3x3) + 6(4x4) + 6(5x5) = 6(9) + 6(16) + 6(25)
= 6(50)

Total surface of the NEW cube
6(6x6) = 6(36)

The ratio of total surface area of the small cubes to that of the NEW cube = 6(50)/6(36)
= 50/36
= [spoiler]25/18[/spoiler]
= C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:09 pm

by shefdsouza » Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:03 pm
Why do you do 6(old cube surface)+6(old cube surface)+^(old cube surface)?
Why is it 6?? When 6 is the side of the new big cube?
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Thu Aug 03, 2017 4:37 am
shefdsouza wrote:Why do you do 6(old cube surface)+6(old cube surface)+^(old cube surface)?
Why is it 6?? When 6 is the side of the new big cube?
A cube has 6 faces, so if the length of one edge of a cube is k, each of the six faces has area k^2, and the total surface area of the cube is 6k^2.

So the number '6' appears in the solution to this problem for two completely different reasons -- you'll always multiply by 6 when you calculate the surface area of any cube, but in this question '6' coincidentally also happens to be the length of an edge of the largest cube.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:04 pm
I'm not sure about the stem here: it's not clear whether the cube is made by gluing the cubes together in some way (like a tower of cubes) or by breaking in down into 216 unit cubes, then using those to form a giant cube. I guess the intention is the second ... but even then 'melting' gives such a strange (and wrong) impression of what's happening here.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:06 am
Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:I'm not sure about the stem here: it's not clear whether the cube is made by gluing the cubes together in some way (like a tower of cubes) or by breaking in down into 216 unit cubes, then using those to form a giant cube. I guess the intention is the second ... but even then 'melting' gives such a strange (and wrong) impression of what's happening here.
If we picture the cubes being made out of some metal or plastic that can be melted into liquid state, then poured into a new mold without changing total volume, this could make sense.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1