BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Need advice! Retake, don't retake...1st round, 2nd round...

Share tips as you apply, write essays, interview...
Expert replies
by mj12g » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:59 pm
Hi guys,

I haven't been around BTG in a while, as I took the GMAT a year ago and ultimately decided against an immediate retake, for which I'm kicking myself now. I got a 720, which is undoubtedly respectable, but lower than I was expecting. Also, it was pretty horrifically skewed: I got a 50V/99% and a 40Q/56% (5.5 on writing sample). I also decided against applying last year to get some more work experience. So here's my situation: I've been out of college for over 3 years (4 years come fall 2011), I work at a very respectable economic and financial consulting firm that specializes in litigation support, and I had a 3.775 GPA at Boston College (thus I have plenty of quantitative experience to try to offset the low quant score). I was planning on applying to six top schools this first round, then a few more schools for second round. Basically, my dilemma is this: should I continue to apply first round (i.e. continue my current path), or should I stop now, start studying for the GMAT, retake it, and try for second round for all my schools? My initial plan was just to retake the GMAT and reapply next year if I was rejected, but do schools look particularly unfavorably on re-applicants? Everything I've read says no, but I find that hard to believe. Also, does anyone have experience with long periods between retakes? I expect that I'm very rusty after a year, but I have no idea how much effort would be required to bring me back up to speed. Sorry for the whining post, but I'm sort of up a creek here, and I know you all have far more experience than I do in these matters. Thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — The Application Process |

by Bryant@VeritasPrep » Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:43 am
I'd go first round with a 720 even with a bad split so long as you can demonstrate quant ability in other ways. The school logs the 720 straight into their stats, so from a ranking perspective, the split doesn't figure in and the 720 should be attractive to just about any school. You should be able to leverage that score with a good application and better your odds of getting in with a first round advantage. As for reapplicants, the key is what you do with the year in between, which is what the committees really focus on. There is some inherent risk there, but the long and short of it is, I don't think a marginal improvement in a 700+ GMAT score will get you any farther, and you always risk scoring lower as well. I'd spend my time preparing some impressive essays instead. Good luck!
Bryant Michaels
MBA Admissions Consultant


Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options
Join the discussion

by mj12g » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:16 am
Thank Bryant, that actually makes me feel quite a bit better about my applications overall. I didn't realize that the initial rankings use only the composite score. One more quick question, if you have a moment (and I apologize if there are already multiple threads about this), but is there any evidence that traditionally quant-heavy programs (e.g. Chicago, MIT, Columbia) will consider someone with a low quant score (but also with a high verbal, of course) in order to diversify their program? While my top schools are not quite as quant-focused, like Harvard, Kellogg, and Wharton, I don't want to feel as if I'm automatically out of the running at the other schools. Thanks for all the help!
Join the discussion

by Bryant@VeritasPrep » Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:36 am
It's not so much that the schools are needing to "diversify" their classes with folks who are better at verbal than math, it's more that those schools have such a heavy quant curriculum, their concern would be that someone with a low quant score would be hopelessly lost. If you can demonstrate you will not be lost in the sea of numbers (for instance by showing quant ability in other ways such as in your work duties or by taking an extension class, etc) it could help. Of course it's not all about the GMAT, so don't get too overly focused on that. Your essays, recommendations and work history play a much larger role in the admissions process.
Bryant Michaels
MBA Admissions Consultant


Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options
Join the discussion