BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sibling-PC

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:17 am
ruplun wrote:If among 5 children there are 2 siblings, in how many ways can the children be seated in a row so that the siblings do not sit together?
Good = Total - Bad.

Total:
Number of ways to arrange the 5 children = 5! = 120.

Bad:
In a bad arrangement, the 2 siblings sit adjacent to each other.
Let [AB] represent the 2 siblings sitting adjacent to each other.
Number of ways to arrange the 4 elements [AB] and the 3 other children = 4! = 24.
Since AB can be reversed to BA, we multiply by 2:
24*2 = 48.

Good = 120-48 = 72.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by fr743 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:03 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
ruplun wrote:If among 5 children there are 2 siblings, in how many ways can the children be seated in a row so that the siblings do not sit together?
Good = Total - Bad.

Total:
Number of ways to arrange the 5 children = 5! = 120.

Bad:
In a bad arrangement, the 2 siblings sit adjacent to each other.
Let [AB] represent the 2 siblings sitting adjacent to each other.
Number of ways to arrange the 4 elements [AB] and the 3 other children = 4! = 24.
Since AB can be reversed to BA, we multiply by 2:
24*2 = 48.

Good = 120-48 = 72.
OABAA
OAABA
OAAAB
AOABA
AOAAB
AAOAB
BAOAA
BAAOA
ABAOA
BAAAO
ABAAO
AABAO

12 => MULTIPLY BY 2 Total 24.

Why am I wrong?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:33 am
fr743 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
ruplun wrote:If among 5 children there are 2 siblings, in how many ways can the children be seated in a row so that the siblings do not sit together?
Good = Total - Bad.

Total:
Number of ways to arrange the 5 children = 5! = 120.

Bad:
In a bad arrangement, the 2 siblings sit adjacent to each other.
Let [AB] represent the 2 siblings sitting adjacent to each other.
Number of ways to arrange the 4 elements [AB] and the 3 other children = 4! = 24.
Since AB can be reversed to BA, we multiply by 2:
24*2 = 48.

Good = 120-48 = 72.
OABAA
OAABA
OAAAB
AOABA
AOAAB
AAOAB
BAOAA
BAAOA
ABAOA
BAAAO
ABAAO
AABAO

12 => MULTIPLY BY 2 Total 24.

Why am I wrong?
I'm not sure why you have 3 A's in your arrangements.

Call the elements {AB], C, D and E and count all the possible arrangements:
[AB]CDE
[AB]CED
[AB]DCE
[AB]DEC
[AB]ECD
[AB]EDC
There are 6 arrangements in which A occupies position 1 and B occupies position 2.

Since [AB] can be reversed to [BA], we multiply by 2:
Number of of arrangements in which [AB] occupies the first 2 positions = 2*6 = 12.

[AB] can occupy 4 sets of adjacent positions:
Positions 1 and 2
Positions 2 and 3
Positions 3 and 4
Positions 4 and 5

Each set of adjacent positions will yield 12 possible arrangements, as shown above.
Since there are 4 sets of adjacent positions, we multiply by 4:
Total arrangements in which [AB] sit adjacent to each other = 12*4 = 48.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by fr743 » Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:39 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
fr743 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
ruplun wrote:If among 5 children there are 2 siblings, in how many ways can the children be seated in a row so that the siblings do not sit together?
Good = Total - Bad.

Total:
Number of ways to arrange the 5 children = 5! = 120.

Bad:
In a bad arrangement, the 2 siblings sit adjacent to each other.
Let [AB] represent the 2 siblings sitting adjacent to each other.
Number of ways to arrange the 4 elements [AB] and the 3 other children = 4! = 24.
Since AB can be reversed to BA, we multiply by 2:
24*2 = 48.

Good = 120-48 = 72.
OABAA
OAABA
OAAAB
AOABA
AOAAB
AAOAB
BAOAA
BAAOA
ABAOA
BAAAO
ABAAO
AABAO

12 => MULTIPLY BY 2 Total 24.

Why am I wrong?
I'm not sure why you have 3 A's in your arrangements.

Call the elements {AB], C, D and E and count all the possible arrangements:
[AB]CDE
[AB]CED
[AB]DCE
[AB]DEC
[AB]ECD
[AB]EDC
There are 6 arrangements in which A occupies position 1 and B occupies position 2.

Since [AB] can be reversed to [BA], we multiply by 2:
Number of of arrangements in which [AB] occupies the first 2 positions = 2*6 = 12.

[AB] can occupy 4 sets of adjacent positions:
Positions 1 and 2
Positions 2 and 3
Positions 3 and 4
Positions 4 and 5

Each set of adjacent positions will yield 12 possible arrangements, as shown above.
Since there are 4 sets of adjacent positions, we multiply by 4:
Total arrangements in which [AB] sit adjacent to each other = 12*4 = 48.

But they must not sit TOGETHER.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:45 am
fr743 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
fr743 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
ruplun wrote:If among 5 children there are 2 siblings, in how many ways can the children be seated in a row so that the siblings do not sit together?
Good = Total - Bad.

Total:
Number of ways to arrange the 5 children = 5! = 120.

Bad:
In a bad arrangement, the 2 siblings sit adjacent to each other.
Let [AB] represent the 2 siblings sitting adjacent to each other.
Number of ways to arrange the 4 elements [AB] and the 3 other children = 4! = 24.
Since AB can be reversed to BA, we multiply by 2:
24*2 = 48.

Good = 120-48 = 72.
OABAA
OAABA
OAAAB
AOABA
AOAAB
AAOAB
BAOAA
BAAOA
ABAOA
BAAAO
ABAAO
AABAO

12 => MULTIPLY BY 2 Total 24.

Why am I wrong?
I'm not sure why you have 3 A's in your arrangements.

Call the elements {AB], C, D and E and count all the possible arrangements:
[AB]CDE
[AB]CED
[AB]DCE
[AB]DEC
[AB]ECD
[AB]EDC
There are 6 arrangements in which A occupies position 1 and B occupies position 2.

Since [AB] can be reversed to [BA], we multiply by 2:
Number of of arrangements in which [AB] occupies the first 2 positions = 2*6 = 12.

[AB] can occupy 4 sets of adjacent positions:
Positions 1 and 2
Positions 2 and 3
Positions 3 and 4
Positions 4 and 5

Each set of adjacent positions will yield 12 possible arrangements, as shown above.
Since there are 4 sets of adjacent positions, we multiply by 4:
Total arrangements in which [AB] sit adjacent to each other = 12*4 = 48.

But they must not sit TOGETHER.
Correct.
As just shown, there are 48 arrangements in which A and B are next to each other.
These are the bad arrangements.

The total number of ways to arrange the 5 children = 5! = 120.
This is the total number of arrangements.

Thus, of these 120 arrangements, the number of arrangements in which A and B are NOT next to each other = 120-48 = 72.
Total-Bad = Good.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Bek » Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:54 pm
C - sibling-1
c - sibling-2

CAcAA
CAAcA
CAAAc
ACAcA
ACAAc
AACAc
cACAA
cAACA
cAAAC
AcACA
AcAAC
AAcAC

Total - 12
Join the discussion