vittalgmat wrote:Ian Stewart wrote:Yes, it is possible to solve quite quickly in fact, as long as you flip the problem around: if you figure out the probability you do *not* get a pair, then subtract from 1, you find the probability of getting at least one pair. See Sudhir's solution here (and I offered an alternative direct solution in the following discussion):
www.beatthegmat.com/combination-and-per ... t8924.html
Ian,
On a totally tangential note, can one expect to see Q which uses deck of cards as an example ?? . I am kinda curious. I agree that cards provide lot of interesting problems in probability, permutation, combn. However, I think, for a card question, the test maker has to assume that the test taker knows about them for him to refrain from mentioning them, lest the problem description would become very wordy. ( eg 4 suites of 13 cards each, blah blah). On the other hand, explaining dice in 1 sentence is easy.
Ian, stuart, stacey, ron.. your thoughts please.
thanks
-V
If you did see a question about a standard deck of cards on the GMAT, they would need to explain what's in a deck of a cards- 4 suits, thirteen types of card, etc. Otherwise people who don't play cards would be at a disadvantage. I'm pretty sure I've seen a cards question, but it had nothing to do with playing cards- the cards were numbered from 1 to 10 or something similar.
If you take an undergrad combinatorics (counting/probability) course, you'll see dozens of questions about cards; one of the standard exercises is working out the probability of various poker hands. Working out, say, the probability of being dealt a full house with five cards is too difficult for the GMAT, but could be good practice for the highest level counting problems on the test - at least, if you can do that problem, you can probably to most GMAT counting problems.
cramya- yes, if you want to determine the probability that two independent events both occur, you multiply their individual probabilities. If you still have questions after reading the link above, post here and I'll do my best to answer.
