utkalnayak wrote:Thank you Brent.
I missed this point, somehow half way through writing these equations, I got distracted towards plugging in numbers and tried to work it out. Eventually ended up getting it wrong. Its a shame I was this close yet got it wrong.
Most of the time simplifying to equation is better than plugging in answer choices first is what my experience is.
Plugging in answer choices is a great strategy, though it might get messy here. If I get stuck on a problem, I usually ask myself if I'm not taking the question literally enough. Sometimes the whole issue in math is taking a problem intuitively ("So what they're REALLY saying is ...") rather than literally ("So what they're ACTUALLY saying is ...").
Let's take a literal approach to this problem. We want the minimum population, so let's call that number m. (
Always start with the variable you seek. Make the minimum district m, not the other districts!) We know that the OTHER districts can be AT MOST 10% greater than the minimum. Since we want the minimum for our district, we also want the MAXIMUM for the other districts, so that we have as few people as people in m. That means the other districts are 10% greater than m, or 1.1m. Success!
So our city has one district of m and 10 districts of 1.1m, for a population of m + 10*(1.1m), or 12m. Then we solve 12m = 132,000, and we're set!