As per B:
(k+1) / 3 is an odd number.
A general odd number can be written as 2n+1 where n is a number.
So (k+1) / 3 = 2n+1
=> k+1 = 6n+3
=> k = 6n + 2.
So the possible values of k = 2,8,14,...
When k = 2, (k+2) is divisible by 4 so the whole expression is div by 4
When k = 8, (K+2) is 10 divisible by 2 so the other part should be either div by 2 or 4 to get the whole expression as a multiple of 4. The other part (k^2+4K+3) if you put k = 8 it will be 99 not div by 2 or 4. So the whole expression is not div by 4.
Thus we can say Insufficient.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Number Properties. MGMAT CAT sum
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
I used a similar approach with a more "qualitative" understanding, rather than resorting to 2n+1:shovan85 wrote:As per B:
(k+1) / 3 is an odd number.
A general odd number can be written as 2n+1 where n is a number.
So (k+1) / 3 = 2n+1
=> k+1 = 6n+3
=> k = 6n + 2.
So the possible values of k = 2,8,14,...
When k = 2, (k+2) is divisible by 4 so the whole expression is div by 4
When k = 8, (K+2) is 10 divisible by 2 so the other part should be either div by 2 or 4 to get the whole expression as a multiple of 4. The other part (k^2+4K+3) if you put k = 8 it will be 99 not div by 2 or 4. So the whole expression is not div by 4.
Thus we can say Insufficient.
K+1/3 = odd integer so
k+1 = 3* odd integer
So k+1 is some odd multiple of 3, such as 3, 9, 15
k itself is "one less" than these multiples, or 2, 8, 14.
If k=2 then k+2 is divisible by 4, as Shovan said.
If k=8, then the previous statement should've already taught you that the expression is not divisible by 4: K+2 is 10, which is not divisible by 4, and the quadratic is composed of even+even+3 (since k itself is even), which will result with an odd number for any even k. So for k=8, the expression is not divisible by 4, leaving both a yes and a no answer - insufficient.
k is div by 8 that means we can write k = 8x (where x is an integer).novel wrote:could some one please tell me how is 1 sufficient...
Now put it in the Eqn: (k+2)*(k^2+4K+3) = (8x+2) * (64x^2 + 32x +3)
8x+2 is a multiple of 2 not 4. You can verify by putting some integer values of x/
x=0 8x+2 = 2
x=1 8x+2 = 10
.. ..
(64x^2 + 32x +3) the first two parts are clearly divisible by 4 as 64x^2 is a multiple of 4 and 32x is a multiple of 4.
So we can say 64x^2 + 32x is multiple of 4.
Now to a multiple of 4 if u add 3 then it will NEVER be a multiple of 4.
Thus sufficiently says 1 is not divisible by 4.
Hope this makes sense. Let me know if any further doubts.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
thank you very muchshovan85 wrote:k is div by 8 that means we can write k = 8x (where x is an integer).novel wrote:could some one please tell me how is 1 sufficient...
Now put it in the Eqn: (k+2)*(k^2+4K+3) = (8x+2) * (64x^2 + 32x +3)
8x+2 is a multiple of 2 not 4. You can verify by putting some integer values of x/
x=0 8x+2 = 2
x=1 8x+2 = 10
.. ..
(64x^2 + 32x +3) the first two parts are clearly divisible by 4 as 64x^2 is a multiple of 4 and 32x is a multiple of 4.
So we can say 64x^2 + 32x is multiple of 4.
Now to a multiple of 4 if u add 3 then it will NEVER be a multiple of 4.
Thus sufficiently says 1 is not divisible by 4.
Hope this makes sense. Let me know if any further doubts.

















