hey folks.. can anyone explain or prephase the following argument for me please..
-Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if, over time,claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums.But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own.Therefore, an under priced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.
-Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if, over time,claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums.But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own.Therefore, an under priced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.













