BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

PRINCESTONE-VOTERS

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

PRINCESTONE-VOTERS

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:35 am
Did the majority of voters polled claim that they planned to vote for candidate Q ?

(1) Of the people polled, those claiming that they planned to vote for candidate Q
outnumbered those who did not by 4 to 1.
(2) In the election, candidate Q received 20,000 votes and candidate P received
15,000 votes.



Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.



Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.



BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.



EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.



Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT SUFFICIENT
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:06 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:Did the majority of voters polled claim that they planned to vote for candidate Q ?
(1) Of the people polled, those claiming that they planned to vote for candidate Q
outnumbered those who did not by 4 to 1.
(2) In the election, candidate Q received 20,000 votes and candidate P received
15,000 votes.
Of the people polled, those claiming that they planned to vote for candidate Q
outnumbered those who did not by 4 to 1.

This directly tells us that majority of voters polled claim that they planned to vote for candidate Q

So Sufficient!!

Statement2 doesnt speak about planning to vote for candidate Q

INSUFFICIENT

pick A
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1