PRINCESTONE-WRITER

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

PRINCESTONE-WRITER

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:17 am
Reporters who write for a major wire service are more likely to have an effect on public issues than do writers who write for only one newspaper. Since a story on a wire service will be run in many different papers across the world, these authors will be read by many more people. Therefore, their work is likely to reach more of the population that discusses and formulates public issues than that of reporters who work for one publication. It follows then that these pieces are of a much higher level of quality than stories written for publication in a single newspaper.

The conclusion in the argument above is dependent on which one of the following presuppositions?



Reporters who work for one paper do not care about public issues.



The general public can identify which stories come from a newswire and which stories were written for one publication.



The quality of a newspaper story can be measured by the number of people who read the story.



Stories that are not carried on a major wire service cannot have any effect on public issues.



Reporters who write for only one publication are not capable of reaching a broad audience.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:26 am
WHY E IS WRONG?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:3 members

by outreach » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:18 am
is the answer C


i chose it because in the arg
Reporters write for wire service -> run in many different papers across the world hence more people read -> work reaches more population -> higer quality
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
Thanked: 87 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by hardik.jadeja » Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:49 pm
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:WHY E IS WRONG?
We need to find an assumption that is used to reach the conclusion given in the passage.

The conclusion is that since reporters who write for a major wire service reach more of the population, their articles are of a much higher level of quality.

Lets have a look at option C.

The quality of a newspaper story can be measured by the number of people who read the story.

So basically option C says that if an article A is read by 1000 people and article B is read by 50 people, then article A is of better quality than B since more people have read article A.

So if option C is right, then it supports the conclusion given above.

Option E says - Reporters who write for only one publication are not capable of reaching a broad audience.

It is clearly given in passage, with reasons, that wire service reporters have better reach than writers who write for only one newspaper.

Hope that helps..

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:39 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by pnk » Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:55 pm
hardik.jadeja wrote:
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:WHY E IS WRONG?
We need to find an assumption that is used to reach the conclusion given in the passage.

The conclusion is that since reporters who write for a major wire service reach more of the population, their articles are of a much higher level of quality.

Lets have a look at option C.

The quality of a newspaper story can be measured by the number of people who read the story.

So basically option C says that if an article A is read by 1000 people and article B is read by 50 people, then article A is of better quality than B since more people have read article A.

So if option C is right, then it supports the conclusion given above.

Option E says - Reporters who write for only one publication are not capable of reaching a broad audience.

It is clearly given in passage, with reasons, that wire service reporters have better reach than writers who write for only one newspaper.

Hope that helps..
Additionally, argument never discusses 'capability of writers', it just says that one kind of writers write for wire service and other for local. So E is out of scope

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:49 pm
ok here quality is the main issue than the no of readers so C is better option.

oa is C