BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

SC - Pronoun reference

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:20 am
Thanked: 7 times

SC - Pronoun reference

by ankit0703 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:47 am
Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.

This is the grammatically correct sentence. My doubt is, how IT mentioned in the sentence is referring to radio?

As far I learned, It should refer to the subject of preios clause, i.e. Marconi ?
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:12 pm
Thanked: 339 times
Followed by:49 members
GMAT Score:770

by eagleeye » Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:38 am
ankit0703 wrote:Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating with a large, public audience.

This is the grammatically correct sentence. My doubt is, how IT mentioned in the sentence is referring to radio?

As far I learned, It should refer to the subject of previous clause, i.e. Marconi ?
Hi ankit0703:

The antecedent of the pronoun should be non-ambiguous. The word "it" cannot refer to a person. It can only refer to inanimate things, objects, collective nouns etc. but never a person. Since, in the sentence at case, radio is an inanimate object, and Marconi is a proper noun, "it" refers back to the radio. Since "it" can only refer to the radio in this case, the sentence is correct.

Let me know if this helps :)
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:02 am
In addition to what eagleeye said, we do have to apply a little bit of logic when matching pronouns with their antecedents. In this case, "it" is a tool for communicating with a large, public audience. In the previous clause, we have "the radio" referred to as a tool as well.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:20 am
Thanked: 7 times

by ankit0703 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:30 pm
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:In addition to what eagleeye said, we do have to apply a little bit of logic when matching pronouns with their antecedents. In this case, "it" is a tool for communicating with a large, public audience. In the previous clause, we have "the radio" referred to as a tool as well.
If we remove the word tool from the latter half of the sentence, could IT be ambiguous? It could refer to radio or telephone?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:10 am
Thanked: 13 times

by shekhar.kataria » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:53 am
IT in the second clause is subject pronoun. it refers to the subject noun of the previous clause.


Experts please correct if the point above is wrong.

If we remove the word tool from the latter half of the sentence, could IT be ambiguous? It could refer to radio or telephone?
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:23 am
shekhar.kataria wrote:IT in the second clause is subject pronoun. it refers to the subject noun of the previous clause.


Experts please correct if the point above is wrong.

If we remove the word tool from the latter half of the sentence, could IT be ambiguous? It could refer to radio or telephone?
Well, the subject of the first clause is Marconi, but I think you're on the right track.

The first clause says that the radio could substitute for the telephone.

The second says it has become the the opposite (of the telephone).

Thus, "it" must be "radio."
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1