-
neeti2711
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:48 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
SwiftCo recently remodeled its offices to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which requires that certain businesses make their properties accessible to those with disabilities. Contractors built ramps where stairs had been, increased the number of handicapped parking spaces in the parking lot, lowered door knobs and cabinet handles, and installed adaptive computer equipment.
Which of the following is the most likely inference based on the statements above?
(A) SwiftCo is now in compliance with ADA requirements.
(B) SwiftCo has at least one employee or customer who uses a wheelchair.
(C) Prior to the renovation, some doors and cabinets may have been out of reach for some employees.
(D) The costs of the renovation were less than what SwiftCo would have been liable for had it been sued for ADA violations.
(E) Businesses without adaptive computer equipment are in violation of the ADA.
OA: C
Why not E? I think we can eliminate C because it talks about some employees . However the argument does not mention employees. It just says ''accessible to those with disabilities''(not necessarily employees)
Which of the following is the most likely inference based on the statements above?
(A) SwiftCo is now in compliance with ADA requirements.
(B) SwiftCo has at least one employee or customer who uses a wheelchair.
(C) Prior to the renovation, some doors and cabinets may have been out of reach for some employees.
(D) The costs of the renovation were less than what SwiftCo would have been liable for had it been sued for ADA violations.
(E) Businesses without adaptive computer equipment are in violation of the ADA.
OA: C
Why not E? I think we can eliminate C because it talks about some employees . However the argument does not mention employees. It just says ''accessible to those with disabilities''(not necessarily employees)
