Strategy takeaway for CR?

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:39 am
Location: Bengaluru, India
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:640

Strategy takeaway for CR?

by sachindia » Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:50 pm
Hi Experts,
What would be the strategy takeaway in this scenario?


In order to withstand tidal currents, juvenile horseshoe crabs frequently burrow in the sand. Such burrowing
discourages barnacles from clinging to their shells. When fully grown, however, the crabs can readily withstand
tidal currents without burrowing, and thus they acquire substantial populations of barnacles. Surprisingly, in
areas where tidal currents are very weak, juvenile horseshoe crabs are found not to have signi� cant barnacle
populations, even though they seldom burrow.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising � nding?
(A) Tidal currents do not themselves dislodge barnacles from the shells of horseshoe crabs.
(B) Barnacles most readily attach themselves to horseshoe crabs in areas where tidal currents are weakest.
(C) The strength of the tidal currents in a given location varies widely over the course of a day.
(D) A very large barnacle population can signi� cantly decrease the ability of a horseshoe crab to � nd food.
(E) Until they are fully grown, horseshoe crabs shed their shells and grow new ones several times a year.



We can solve a question if we are able to visualize or atleast understand what is the premise talking about. I wasn't able to see the relation between the barnacles and teh crabs and so couldn't get the answer. I had never heard of barnacles.

In such a scenario, if we don't understand the premise, I guess it isnt of any use reading the answers. We must let go our ego and just randomly chose a answer and move on, Time saved can be utilised on some other question .

What do u say?
Regards,
Sach
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
Followed by:266 members
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:09 am
The beginning said that burrowing prevents barnacles. Later the passage said that young crabs that don't burrow don't get barnacles.

Your question is why?

E

If they shed their shells regularly they won't have barnacles.

You have to find the logic and really the meaning of barnacles is irrelevant.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:39 am
Location: Bengaluru, India
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:640

by sachindia » Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:13 am
It is not just about barnacles.

If the premise or the argument is not clear( reasons may be because I have no idea what barnacles are or when the premise says : Such burrowing
discourages barnacles from clinging to their shells. I dint really know whom the pronoun their was referring to: barnacles or crabs. ) so when you get confused like this and dont know really understand the argument completely, it doesn't make sense reading answer choices .

What do u say?
Regards,
Sach