Comparison - omitting words

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 3:00 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Comparison - omitting words

by Makushr1 » Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:22 pm
OG # 89

Dirt roads may evoke the bucolic simplicity of another century, but financially strained townships point out that dirt roads cost twice as much as maintaining paved roads.

b) dirt roads cost twice as much to maintain as paved roads do.
c) maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as paved roads do.

The answer is B.

I was torn between the two because I just got done with the Comparison section of the MGMAT SC guide. In the guide, it shows how you can omit words (My toe is bigger than Joe's [toe can be omitted]).

The answer in the back says C "maintaining dirt roads is compared to paved roads in general."

My question is, why can't the word "Maintaining" be omitted? Isn't C the same as saying "Maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as maintaining dirt roads do"?

I knew B sounded better, but I thought C could also be correct. Are you not suppose to omit verbs then, just nouns?
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:00 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:760

by scorpionz » Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:49 pm
Well, I'm no expert but here are my two cents...

When comparing actions, one action must be genuinely compared to another action, not to a noun..

For example:
Playing football is better than tennis.

The above sentence sounds illogical because the act of playing football is being compared to only the noun "tennis". What is the author trying to say? Is playing football better than playing tennis? Or is playing football better than watching tennis?

If someone were to say the above sentence to us, we might correctly understand that the person is trying to say that playing football is better than playing tennis, however there lies our assumption that the two actions (playing of both sports) are being compared. The sentence though, at the end of the day, is grammatically incorrect.

The same catch is in this problem. What option C does is that it compares the cost of "maintaining dirt roads" to "paved roads" which is not the intent of the statement.

In the example that you've given "My toe is bigger than Joe's" the omission of the word "toe" does not distort the meaning of the sentence because the possessive form "Joe's" has been used. To equate this with option C above, this sentence would've been written as "My toe is bigger than Joe"..This creates the illogical comparison that my toe is bigger than Joe as a whole..

In conclusion, I'm not sure what the rule is..whether only nouns can be omitted or both nouns & verbs. But the key is that two like items must be always compared...noun to noun..action to action..phenomenon to phenomenon..

Hope this helps!!

• Page 1 of 1