BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

rates

Expert replies
by resilient » Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:41 am
Tom and Linda stand at point A. Linda begins to walk in a straight line away from Tom at a constant rate of 2 miles per hour. One hour later, Tom begins to jog in a straight line in the exact opposite direction at a constant rate of 6 miles per hour. If both Tom and Linda travel indefinitely, what is the positive difference, in minutes, between the amount of time it takes Tom to cover half of the distance that Linda has covered and the amount of time it takes Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered?



60
72
84
90
108


qa is 108
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

rates

by resilient » Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:49 am
question is straightforward BUT a bit tough on setting up the equations. ANy help on setting up equations?
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by xilef » Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:10 am
rate*time=distance

Tom's distance = 6*time
Linda's distance = 2*time

Linda left 1hr earlier, so we will add 1 hr to her time


amount of time it takes Tom to cover half of the distance that Linda has covered:

6t = [2(t+1)] / 2
t=1/5 of an hr or 12 mins


amount of time it takes Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered:


6t = [2(t+1)] * 2
t = 2hrs or 120 mins


the positive difference, in minutes, between the 2 times:

120 - 12 = 108 mins
Join the discussion

time

by resilient » Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:22 am
ok so the trick to the question is setting both distances equal to eachother in order to force time values! correct! THese questions are getting much easier!
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by xilef » Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:48 pm
that's right, because that is exactly what the question is asking:

amount of time it takes Tom to cover half of the distance that Linda has covered, meaning when will Tom's distance be equal to half of Linda's distance

amount of time it takes Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered, meaning when will Tom's distance be equal to twice Linda's distance
Join the discussion