BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

hard question from kaplan gmat DS chapter...

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 7:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

hard question from kaplan gmat DS chapter...

by davedecibel » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:44 pm
[please note that =< stands for "less than or equal to"]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If z is an integer, is z prime?

(1) 15! < z

(2) 17! + 2 =< z =< 17!+17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



i read the solution on the book, it might be because it's night and i'm tired now, but i didn't understand the explanation at all.....i suck at number properties O_o

could you tell me how long does it take you to figure out the right answer, and how do you do it?????i'm lost!
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 7:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by davedecibel » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:48 pm
ok after i read the explanation more carefully i got it... still, it's not really intuitive. maybe some of you can find out a better way? i'm curious....
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:00 am
Thanked: 1 times

by TOPGMAT » Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:16 pm
Whats the ans ? Is it B?

17! + 2 = 17*16*....3*2*1 + 2 = 2(Z+1) =>divisible by 2... Hence not prime...
Similarly every other number can be grouped...
Except if the question was 17!+1... In that case I don't know how to proceed.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: Gwalior, India
Thanked: 31 times

by goyalsau » Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:18 pm
TOPGMAT wrote:Whats the ans ? Is it B?

17! + 2 = 17*16*....3*2*1 + 2 = 2(Z+1) =>divisible by 2... Hence not prime...
Similarly every other number can be grouped...
Except if the question was 17!+1... In that case I don't know how to proceed.

Even i suppose to write this

17! + 1 , will not be divisible by any number from 2 to 17,

I think answer of this question should be B,

and please Daved , please share the Official explanation,
I am sure that will help a lot, till we don't have any other source of information..
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:25 pm
stmt1,

15!<Z

No info about Z

Insufficient

stmt2,

17! + 2 <= z <= 17! + 17

17! = 1*2*3*...17

17!+2 = 2(1+1*3*..........17)

17! +2 is divisible by 2 .. not prime

Similarly check for 3,4,5....17

17! +3 is divisible by 3.. Not prime

17! +4 is divisible by 4..not prime

.......
....
17! +17 is divisible by 17.. not prime

Sufficient.

Pick B
--Anand--
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 7:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by davedecibel » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:46 pm
you guys got it perfectly right, b is the correct answer, and the reasoning behind that is perfect.

i have some difficulties in such questions... do you think that manhattan "number properties" book would help me out on these topics?
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 7:07 am
Thanked: 2 times

by davedecibel » Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:50 pm
goyalsau wrote: and please Daved , please share the Official explanation,
I am sure that will help a lot, till we don't have any other source of information..
the original explanation is pretty much the same you all figured out, it's just written badly imo O_o
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: Gwalior, India
Thanked: 31 times

by goyalsau » Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:59 am
selango wrote:
I there any way by which we can figure out Whether 17! + 1 is a prime number or not.
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:53 am
Hey guys,

Great thread, and the answer is indeed B for the reasons everyone discussed. If you're interested, we actually had a great conversation about this one a few months ago that may have delved even further into it. Take a look:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/prime-numbers-t62545.html
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: Gwalior, India
Thanked: 31 times

by goyalsau » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:15 pm
Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Hey guys,

Great thread, and the answer is indeed B for the reasons everyone discussed. If you're interested, we actually had a great conversation about this one a few months ago that may have delved even further into it. Take a look:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/prime-numbers-t62545.html
Thanks Brian,
I got my answer.........
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1