Leapzine - Probability

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:44 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Leapzine - Probability

by suchoudh » Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:58 pm
What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a better-than-50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
(1) 1
(2) 2
(3) 3
(4) 4
(5) 5

OA 3
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:12 pm
suchoudh wrote:What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a better-than-50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
(1) 1
(2) 2
(3) 3
(4) 4
(5) 5

OA 3
A greater than 50% chance that at least one was born in a leap year is the same as a less than 50% chance that none of them was born in a leap year.

So, we can reword the question as, What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a less than 50% chance that none of them was born in a leap year?"

Assuming that 3/4 is the probability that one is NOT born in a leap year, we can see that:
1 person: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 = 0.75 (nope, we want less than 0.5)
2 people: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 x 3/4 = 9/16 (nope, we want less than 0.5)
3 people: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 x 3/4 x 3/4 = 27/64 (this is less than 0.5)

The answer is 3
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:44 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by suchoudh » Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:36 pm
Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:05 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by sreak1089 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:28 pm
Why do we need to assume that the probability that a person is NOT born in a leap year is 3/4?

Is it because 1/4 is the probability that a person is born in a leap year is 1/4?

Brent Hanneson wrote:
suchoudh wrote:What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a better-than-50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
(1) 1
(2) 2
(3) 3
(4) 4
(5) 5

OA 3
A greater than 50% chance that at least one was born in a leap year is the same as a less than 50% chance that none of them was born in a leap year.

So, we can reword the question as, What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a less than 50% chance that none of them was born in a leap year?"

Assuming that 3/4 is the probability that one is NOT born in a leap year, we can see that:
1 person: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 = 0.75 (nope, we want less than 0.5)
2 people: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 x 3/4 = 9/16 (nope, we want less than 0.5)
3 people: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 x 3/4 x 3/4 = 27/64 (this is less than 0.5)

The answer is 3

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:03 pm
sreak1089 wrote:Why do we need to assume that the probability that a person is NOT born in a leap year is 3/4?

Is it because 1/4 is the probability that a person is born in a leap year is 1/4?

Brent Hanneson wrote:
suchoudh wrote:What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a better-than-50% chance that at least one of them was born in a leap year?
(1) 1
(2) 2
(3) 3
(4) 4
(5) 5

OA 3
A greater than 50% chance that at least one was born in a leap year is the same as a less than 50% chance that none of them was born in a leap year.

So, we can reword the question as, What is the minimum number of randomly chosen people needed in order to have a less than 50% chance that none of them was born in a leap year?"

Assuming that 3/4 is the probability that one is NOT born in a leap year, we can see that:
1 person: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 = 0.75 (nope, we want less than 0.5)
2 people: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 x 3/4 = 9/16 (nope, we want less than 0.5)
3 people: P(none born in a leap year) = 3/4 x 3/4 x 3/4 = 27/64 (this is less than 0.5)

The answer is 3
If you assume that the chance of being born on any particular day is that same as all other days, then 1 out of every 4 years is a leap year, so (ingoring the extra day which shifts the probabilities a tiny bit) there's a 1/4 chance of being born in a leap year and a 3/4 chance of being born in other years.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:05 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by sreak1089 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:04 pm
I understand now. Thank you Stuart.