BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

DS: Packing Boxes

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:47 am

DS: Packing Boxes

by Blocked Brain » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:18 am
From GMAT Prep: Data sufficiency

Linda, Robert, and Pat packed a certain number of boxes with books. What is the ratio of the number of boxes of books that Robert packed to the number of boxes of books that Pat packed?

1. Linda packed 30 percent of the total number of boxes of books
2. Robert packed 10 more boxes of books than Pat did.

--> I get that both are not sufficient on their own. But I thought I could play around with both to come up with a ratio for R to P.

Explanations greatly appreciated!
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:18 am
1 is obviously not sufficient since it speaks about linda
2 .says R = P+10
not sufficient cant get R/p
combine them
since linda packed 30 percent therefore r and P packed
70 percent ..let total no be x
R + P = .7x
from statement 2
p+10 + P = .7x
cant still find P and hence cant find r
E
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by san2009 » Thu Apr 29, 2010 9:11 am
WHY couldn't we pick a smart number, say 100 for the total number of boxes and just work with that??
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:28 am
san2009 wrote:WHY couldn't we pick a smart number, say 100 for the total number of boxes and just work with that??
If u wish to pick a number and then proceed, u will certainly get ratio of R over P. But will that ratio be consistent??

Always see to that you get a consistent answer be it a YES or a strong NO .In this case ratio will vary as total number of boxes vary. So you cant select C.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:45 am
san2009 wrote:WHY couldn't we pick a smart number, say 100 for the total number of boxes and just work with that??
You could; but when you pick numbers in DS, you have to make sure that picking different numbers gives you the same answer to the question.

In this case, if you pick b=100, then:

Linda packs 30
R + P = 70
R - P = 10

R = 40; P = 30
R:P = 4:3

However, if we pick b = 50, then:

Linda packs 30
R + P = 20
R - P = 10

R = 15; P = 5
R:P = 3:1

So, picking numbers is a great approach, because it shows us that the information given is not sufficient to answer the question.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by san2009 » Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:56 am
Let me rephrase/fine-tune my query.
How do we know when we can pick smart numbers, and when we can't? Because in the exam, one may quickly assume 100 to be the total, in which case statements 1 and 2 would be sufficient. Without realizing that if you picked a different total you would have a different ratio, one would move on. Thanks
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:54 pm
san2009 wrote:Let me rephrase/fine-tune my query.
Because in the exam, one may quickly assume
Here's a huge tip for DS: never assume anything.

In Data Sufficiency, we only know what we're explicitly told. Every time you make an assumption about a situation, you're running the risk of falling for a trap.

If you haven't done so recently, I advise looking at the DS directions at the front of the Official Guide (page 24 of the 12th edition), so you can see what you can and can't take for granted.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by san2009 » Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:12 pm
Great, thank you. That is helpful.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:46 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Thouraya » Mon May 23, 2011 11:03 pm
Hi,

I have two questions regarding the above:

1) P+10/P is not a ratio?

2)How about if the second statement says that "Robert packed 10 times more boxed than Pat did", then the equation is: 10p/p, and this would make a ratio and thus is sufficient.

Am I right? Thank you!
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue May 24, 2011 5:39 pm
Thouraya wrote:Hi,

I have two questions regarding the above:

1) P+10/P is not a ratio?

2)How about if the second statement says that "Robert packed 10 times more boxed than Pat did", then the equation is: 10p/p, and this would make a ratio and thus is sufficient.

Am I right? Thank you!
Hi,

(P+10)/P is a ratio, but it's not a constant ratio; in other words, the value of the ratio changes dependent on the value of P.

You're dead on for (2)!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:46 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Thouraya » Wed May 25, 2011 12:43 am
Hi @Stuart,

Can you please elaborate further on your reply above? I'm not sure I understand what you mean, thanks!:)
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed May 25, 2011 10:39 pm
Thouraya wrote:Hi @Stuart,

Can you please elaborate further on your reply above? I'm not sure I understand what you mean, thanks!:)
Sure!

When we say that two items are in a constant ratio, we mean that one is a multiplier of the other. For example, if:

x/y = 2/3

we can also express the relationship as:

3x = 2y

by cross multiplying by the denominators.

However, if we don't have a simple "x/y" on the left side, we won't be dealing with simple multipliers. For example, if our original ratio had been:

(x+3)/(y-4) = 2/3

Then when we cross multiply we get:

3x + 9 = 2y - 8

and even if we gather the numbers on the same side, we have:

3x - 1 = 2y

Since there's a "-1" term, there's no constant ratio between x and y.

We can see that this is true by plugging in numbers.

If x=1, we get:

3 - 1 = 2y
2 = 2y
1=y

So when x=1, y=x

However, when x=2, we get:

6 - 1 = 2y
5 = 2y
5/2 = y

So, when x=2, y no longer equals x.

Similarly, in the example posted above:

(P+10)/P

when P = 1, the ratio is 11/1
when P = 2, the ratio is 12/2 = 6/1

Since varying the value of P changes the ratio, it's not a constant ratio.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1