BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep ds

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

I think it is E - here is why

by gace780 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:46 am
We don't know how many balls are white or how many or even

Case A:
=====
Both events or mutually exlusive - Means none of the White balls and Even - That is why probability is 0

P(W intersect E) = 0

No enough info to get result

Case B:
========
P(W) - P(E) = 0.2

P(W) + P(E) != 1 because we have other colors

P(E) can be calculated only if you know how many even balls or how many whites - No info

P (W or E) = P(W) + P(E) - P(W and E)

A & B together does not give enough info

and hence E
Join the discussion

Re: I think it is E - here is why

by gmat009 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:24 pm
gace780 wrote:We don't know how many balls are white or how many or even

Case A:
=====
Both events or mutually exlusive - Means none of the White balls and Even - That is why probability is 0

P(W intersect E) = 0

No enough info to get result

Case B:
========
P(W) - P(E) = 0.2

P(W) + P(E) != 1 because we have other colors

P(E) can be calculated only if you know how many even balls or how many whites - No info

P (W or E) = P(W) + P(E) - P(W and E)

A & B together does not give enough info

and hence E
Just confused with small thing.
Why are we saying we cannot calculate even number of balls.
P(Even balls)= 5/10 [2,4,6,8,10].
Plz. tell me where I am wrong
Join the discussion

by Gmatss » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:00 am
gmats009 yes we do know p even is 1/2 but you also have to realize problem says each of the 25 balls are numbered from 1-10.
Join the discussion

by warlock » Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:37 pm
Please le3t me know if i am wrong.


from the second statement .

p(w) - p(E) = 0.2

and from the 1st stement p(w)p(E)=0.

(p(W) + p(E))^2 =0.04

this gives p(W)^2 + p(E)^2 ..


(p(W)+ p(E))^2 = p(W)^2 + p(E)^2..


SO IMO C.
Join the discussion

by mental » Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:39 am
OA pls

IMO: E
Join the discussion

by anb » Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:33 am
the answer is E....I chose C when I took the test.

Just for reference, can someone please explain what the opposite is for the probability of getting a white ball or an even number as the question asks?

Isn't it P(not white) + Prob (not even)???

Also, I thought the prob of A or B is just PA + PB...if not, when is this the case?

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by EricLien9122 » Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:06 pm
Q: P(w)+P(E)=?

1. P(w)*P(E)=0

Insufficient, b/c we can't manipulate the equation into P(W)+P(E)

2. P(W)-P(E)=0.2

Insufficient, b/c we can't manipulate the question in to P(W)+P(E)

1+2:

Still insufficient, b/c we can't manipulate the equation into P(E)+P(E).
Join the discussion