BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:00 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

OG13-CR#81
The attribution of the choral work Lacrime to the composer Pescard (1400-1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500s that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treaties from the late 1500s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae. Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since____________.

(A)the treatise from the early 1500s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers

(B)the author of the treatise from the early 1500s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

(C)there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are cultivated specifically for the seed they produce rather than for their leaves or roots not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500s

(D)the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise

(E)no known treatises from the 1600s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae

OA:D

I don't know which one to choose... and don't know exactly what it's about.
can someone explain this?
thank u...
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by amysky_0205 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:51 am
can someone help~??? Experts plz!
Join the discussion

by sri_r » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:51 am
The correct answer is D because even though there are other treatises that attribute Lacrimae to Pescard, what would happen if they all rely on the original treatise(from early 1500s). In such a case, inspite of have multiple treatises as evidence, but the source would still be just one treatise and it is clearly mentioned in the first sentence that we cannot conclude definitely who is the author from a single treatise.
Join the discussion

by himu » Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:40 am
Requesting experts to kindly throw some light.
Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by shenoydevika » Sat Jan 26, 2013 7:02 am
I'm no expert but I will try to explain.

Here is what we understand from what we are told.
1. - Pescard is believed to have composed Lacrime. This is however tentative. Because there is only one treatise from the early 1500s which names him as the composer.
2. - Several new musical treatises from the late 1500s have been discovered. All of these name Pescard as the composer of Lacrime.

Now this should be conclusive proof that Pescard wrote Lacrime right. Because the later treatises confirm what the older one said.

However the author says that newly discovered treatises do no support the attribution.
What could be the reason?

A] Doesn't matter. Doesn't explain why the LATTER treatises shouldn't prove that the first one was correct.
B] Ok maybe so. But if the latter treatises confirm Pescard as the composer, then it must be correct. But we are told it's not.
C]I don't even understand what this option means. Seeds? Leaves? WHATTTT??? Ignore!!!!
D] This option tells us that the latter treatises probably referred to the older ones. So if the older treatise was wrong, the latter ones would be too. That's why we cannot depend on what the latter treatises say. CORRECT OPTION.
E] I disregarded it because it brings in new information about treatises from 1600. We only care about the early 1500s treatise and the late 1500s treatises here!

Hope this helps. I can elaborate if required
Join the discussion

by charu_mahajan » Mon Jan 28, 2013 1:28 pm
I guess shenoydevika has said it all.

EARLY 1500's ---------------------
Only one treatise says that Pescard is composer.

--------------------------- LATE 1500's
Several treatises say that Pescard is composer.

Now look at the question. Why can't we trust those SEVERAL treatises' ???
Maybe the source of information of those SEVERAL treatises was that one treaty from early 1500's.
Does this make sense now??
Join the discussion

by himu » Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:31 pm
Yes thanks Devika n Charu for your expert inputs
real thanks :)
Join the discussion