BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ratios

Expert replies
by eitijan » Wed May 11, 2016 9:50 am
Each employee of Company Z is an employee of either Division X or Division Y, but not both. If each division
has some part-time employees, is the ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time
employees greater for Division X than for Company Z?
(1) The ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time employees is less for Division Y
than for Company Z.
(2) More than half the full-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division X, and more than half of
the part-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division Y.

Not able to approach this question.

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by 800_or_bust » Wed May 11, 2016 11:41 am
eitijan wrote:Each employee of Company Z is an employee of either Division X or Division Y, but not both. If each division
has some part-time employees, is the ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time
employees greater for Division X than for Company Z?
(1) The ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time employees is less for Division Y
than for Company Z.
(2) More than half the full-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division X, and more than half of
the part-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division Y.

Not able to approach this question.

OA D
(1) Since the ratio of FT to PT is less for Division Y than for the company as a whole, then the ratio of FT to PT must be greater for Division X than the company as a whole. Remember, these are the only two divisions and each employee is an employee of only one division. Therefore, the overall company ratio must lie in between the ratios for each of the divisions. In other words, the target question could have simply been restated as "is the ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time employees less for Division Y than for Company Z?" (1) answers this question affirmatively, and therefore is sufficient.

(2) We're told that more than half the full-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division X, and more than half the part-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division Y. Again, since the employees can only work for one division or the other, this also implies that less than half the part-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division X and less than half the full-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division Y.

If more than half the total full-time employees, but less than half the total part-time employees, work for Division X, it logically follows that the ratio FT:PT for Division X must be greater than the corresponding ratio for Company Z as a whole. So this statement is also sufficient to answer the target question.
800 or bust!
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed May 11, 2016 12:56 pm
eitijan wrote:Each employee of Company Z is an employee of either Division X or Division Y, but not both. If each division
has some part-time employees, is the ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time
employees greater for Division X than for Company Z?
(1) The ratio of the number of full-time employees to the number of part-time employees is less for Division Y
than for Company Z.
(2) More than half the full-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division X, and more than half of
the part-time employees of Company Z are employees of Division Y.
To make the situation easier to see, test an EASY CASE.
Let:
Total number of full-time employees at Company Z = 10.
Total number of part-time employees at Company Z = 10.
Resulting ratio:
(full-time at Z)/(part-time at Z) = 10/10 = 1.

Question stem, rephrased:
Is (full-time in X)/(part-time in X) > 1?

Statement 1:
Here, (full-time in Y)/(part-time in Y) < 1.

Test a SMALL ratio for Y.
Case 1: full-time in Y = 1, part-time in Y = 9
In this case:
Full-time in X = 10-1 = 9.
Part-time in X = 10-9 = 1.
Resulting ratio:
(full time in X)/(part-time in X) = 9/1 = 9.
Since the resulting ratio is greater than 1, the answer to the question stem is YES.

Test a LARGE ratio for Y.
Case 1: full-time in Y = 8, part-time in Y = 9
In this case:
Full-time in X = 10-8 = 2.
Part-time in X = 10-9 = 1.
Resulting ratio:
(full time in X)/(part-time in X) = 2/1 = 2.
Since the resulting ratio is greater than 1, the answer to the question stem is YES.

Since the answer is YES in both cases, SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
Here:
Full-time in X > 5.
Part-time in Y > 5.

Test a SMALL VALUE FOR X and a LARGE VALUE FOR Y.
Case 3: full-time in X = 6, part-time in Y = 9, implying that part-time in X = 10-9 = 1
Resulting ratio:
(full time in X)/(part-time in X) = 6/1 = 6.
Since the resulting ratio is greater than 1, the answer to the question stem is YES.

Test a LARGE VALUE FOR X and a SMALL VALUE FOR Y.
Case 3: full-time in X = 9, part-time in Y = 6, implying that part-time in X = 10-6 = 4
Resulting ratio:
(full time in X)/(part-time in X) = 9/4.
Since the resulting ratio is greater than 1, the answer to the question stem is YES.

Since the answer is YES in both cases, SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion