how to solve this

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:23 pm
Thanked: 2 times

how to solve this

by anjaligeorge1 » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:41 am
In a survey, 20 students were each asked whether they watched movie A, B or C. According to the survey, every student had watched at least one of the movies, 12 students had watched movie A, 9 students had watched movie B, 6 students had watched movie C, and 2 students had watched all of the three movies. How many of the students surveyed had watched exactly 2 of the movies? 

(A) 0
(B) 1
(C) 2
(D) 3
(E) 4
Source: — Problem Solving |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Fremont , California
Thanked: 3 times

by kishore » Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:04 pm
This is formula.
N(AUBUC) = N(A) +N(B) +N(C) -N(AiB) -N(BiC)-N(Ci) +N(AiBiC)


20 = 12+9+6-N(AiB) -N(BiC)-N(CiA)+2

20 = 27-N(AiB) -N(BiC)-N(CiA)+2

20 = 29-N(AiB) -N(BiC)-N(CiA)

=> N(AiB) +N(BiC)+N(CiA) = 29 - 20 = 9

9 is the answer, i dont see 9 in the above answers....

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:14 pm
kishore wrote:This is formula.
N(AUBUC) = N(A) +N(B) +N(C) -N(AiB) -N(BiC)-N(Ci) +N(AiBiC)

9 is the answer, i dont see 9 in the above answers....
Wrong formula!

I'm not 100% sure on your use of "U" and "i" (I always thought that "U" meant union and "i" meant intersection), but here's a formula you can use written in words:

Total # of objects = (# with characterstic A) + (# with characterstic B) + (# with characterstic C) - (# with ONLY A&B) - (# with ONLY A&C) - (# with ONLY B&C) - 2(# with ALL of A&B&C) + (# with NONE of A/B/C)

Note that the first 3 items on the right side of the equation aren't "# with ONLY characterstic X" - those items include all objects that have that characteristic.

To explain the formula: anyone who's in 2 groups is going to be counted twice, so we need to subtract them once; anyone who's in all 3 groups is going to be counted three times, so we need to subtract them twice.

Applying the formula to this question:

20 = 12 + 9 + 6 - (double movie goers) - 2(2) + 0

20 = 27 - doubles - 4

20 = 23 - doubles

So, the number of people who saw 2 movies is 23 - 20 = 3: choose (D).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 31 times
GMAT Score:640

by AleksandrM » Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:09 pm
Stuart could you explain this
anyone who's in all 3 groups is going to be counted three times, so we need to subtract them twice.
Why are you subtracting those in all 3 only twice instead of three times?

Thanks.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:51 pm
AleksandrM wrote:Stuart could you explain this
anyone who's in all 3 groups is going to be counted three times, so we need to subtract them twice.
Why are you subtracting those in all 3 only twice instead of three times?

Thanks.
If we subtract them 3 times, then we're not counting them at all.

We want to count everyone once. If someone is in just one group, they're fine; if they're in two groups, they've been counted one "extra" time; if they're in three groups, they've been counted two "extra" times.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:36 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by g_beatthegmat » Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:13 pm
Stuart, I see you're absolutely right in the logic of the formula. But I've also used throughout my career the formula which Kishore has used above.

Here's a link which talks about this. Please pardon me if we're not supposed to give outside links on the forum.

trying to understand the difference between your formula and our formula.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:48 am
Thanked: 15 times

by durgesh79 » Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:33 pm
the term AiB used in your formula (the one given on the site) includes people who watched all three movie C also.

The term uesd by Stuart is specific for only those guys who watched only A and B.

The formula is right. But AIB + BIC + CIA is not what is asked.....

this will include people who watched all 3 movies 3 times .....

Kishore has arrived at 9

the answer will be 9 - 3*(AIBIC) = 9-6 = 3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:36 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by g_beatthegmat » Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:56 pm
Perfecto. Both formulas are correct for different purposes. Good to know.

Thanks all.