BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

22

Expert replies
by vaivish » Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:56 am
. Politician: From the time our party took office almost four years ago the number of people unemployed city-wide increased by less than 20 percent. The opposition party controlled city government during the four preceding years, and the number of unemployed city residents rose by over 20 percent. Thus, due to our leadership, fewer people now find themselves among the ranks of the unemployed, whatever the opposition may claim.
The reasoning in the politician’s argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that
(A) the claims made by the opposition are simply dismissed without being specified
(B) no evidence has been offered to show that any decline in unemployment over the past four years was uniform throughout all areas of the city
(C) the issue of how much unemployment in the city is affected by seasonal fluctuations is ignored
(D) the evidence cited in support of the conclusion actually provides more support for the denial of the conclusion
(E) the possibility has not been addressed that any increase in the number of people employed is due to programs supported by the opposition party
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by reachac » Sat Jul 26, 2008 6:07 am
IMO D
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 3:00 am
I'd be shocked if it wasn't A
Join the discussion