Edited
Last edited by mundasingh123 on Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Veritas prep CR Testimony
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
I remember you once retorting to someone ( bubbli i think ) who had just replied with IMO . You told him that you had clearly asked for an Explanation and the manner wasnt cordial either . Why is it that people cant extend to others courtesies that they expect from others . The post is a Lesson in futility . I have clearly mentioned the OA and you have replied with OA . Makes me want to stop posting Questions.GmatKiss wrote:Clearly C
Last edited by mundasingh123 on Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Thanks Buddymundasingh123 wrote:I remember you once retorting to someone who had just replied with IMO . You told him that you had clearly asked for an Explanation and the manner wasnt cordial either . Why is it that people cant extend to others courtesies that they expect from others . The post is a Lesson in futility . I have clearly mentioned the OA and you have replied with OA . Makes me want to stop posting Questions.GmatKiss wrote:Clearly C
I was unable to explain!, edited my previos post as well.Happy posting!!
EDITED
Last edited by mundasingh123 on Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Hey Munda,
The stimulus clearly states that quite often, not testifying would clearly be construed as defendant's guilt by the jury. So, just because not testifying gives a defendant an aura of guilt doesn't mean that actually testifying would serve him better. Even after testifying he is equally likely to be found guilty or not guilty. This is one common trap called
Opposite Answers. Example. To get admitted to HBS one has to give the GMAT. So we can't assume that any Tom, Dick and Harry who gives the GMAT will get into HBS. Similarly, if testifying would do away with possibility of looking extra guilty in the eyes of the jury doesn't mean that if he does testify he is gonna walk away, no questions asked. Hope that clarifies ur doubt.
The stimulus clearly states that quite often, not testifying would clearly be construed as defendant's guilt by the jury. So, just because not testifying gives a defendant an aura of guilt doesn't mean that actually testifying would serve him better. Even after testifying he is equally likely to be found guilty or not guilty. This is one common trap called
Opposite Answers. Example. To get admitted to HBS one has to give the GMAT. So we can't assume that any Tom, Dick and Harry who gives the GMAT will get into HBS. Similarly, if testifying would do away with possibility of looking extra guilty in the eyes of the jury doesn't mean that if he does testify he is gonna walk away, no questions asked. Hope that clarifies ur doubt.
