-
nileshdalvi
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
- Thanked: 13 times
- Followed by:3 members
A growing number of urban school districts have embraced the practice of "social promotion." Whereby a student is automatically promoted to the next highest grade regardless of whether he or she has passed or failed English class. This policy is flawed, because the only criterion that a student must fulfill in order to advance is to pass a state-wide standardized test.
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the validity of "social promotion"?
(A) Do students have to option of taking a standardized test in a language other than English?
(B) What is the rate of graduation from schools at which "social promotion" is commonly practiced?
(C) How rigorous are the questions on these standardized tests that pertain to English skills?
(D) How prevalent is "social promotion" among school districts in more suburban areas?
(E) If a student fails a standardized test, is he or she given the chance to take it again before having to be kept back?
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the validity of "social promotion"?
(A) Do students have to option of taking a standardized test in a language other than English?
(B) What is the rate of graduation from schools at which "social promotion" is commonly practiced?
(C) How rigorous are the questions on these standardized tests that pertain to English skills?
(D) How prevalent is "social promotion" among school districts in more suburban areas?
(E) If a student fails a standardized test, is he or she given the chance to take it again before having to be kept back?












