manhattan gmat absolutes

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Southern California, USA
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:6 members

manhattan gmat absolutes

by resilient » Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:21 pm
What is X?

1. Absolute value x < 2
2. Absolute value x = 3x-2

statement 1 insuf
statement 2 yields x=1 or 1/2 . how can it be sufficient. I understand that absolutes have pos and neg outcomes yet statement tell otherwise!



qa obviously B
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:05 pm
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:2 members

by rey.fernandez » Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:54 pm
What sets this problem apart from the more basic absolute value equations is that the absolute value of x equals an expression in terms of x.

This is significant because after you solve the equation, you must check your solutions to ensure that the expression on the other side of the absolute value is in fact a positive value.

In this case:

|x| = 3x - 2

x = 3x - 2
2 = 2x
x = 1

This is a solution -- substitute into the original equation to see that. Now, the "other half" of the process is:

x = -3x + 2
4x = 2
x = 1/2

Now, if you plug this into the right-hand side of the original equation, you get a negative number. This is not a solution, therefore, because |x| must yield a positive number. So (2) is in fact sufficient.

Rey
Rey Fernandez
Instructor
Manhattan GMAT

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:25 am
Hi Ian,
I know trick here is to put back and check your answer, will the distance on number line approach will allow me with this trap? how?

Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:19 am
I will IM Ian to help us solve this problem using the distance method.

-V

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:00 pm
vittalgmat wrote:I will IM Ian to help us solve this problem using the distance method.

-V
It's not straightforward to interpret the right side of the equation:

|x| = 3x - 2

as a distance. However, you might notice that if x were negative, the right side of the equation would be negative, and that's certainly impossible, since the left side of the equation can't be negative. So x must be positive or zero, and |x| = x. Since it's clear we could solve the equation x = 3x - 2 for x, the statement is sufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:11 pm
Thanks Ian
-V