BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Pls chk if approach is correct?

Expert replies

by jimmiejaz » Tue Nov 04, 2008 3:58 pm
Stacey Koprince wrote:Received a PM asking me to respond. From the top:

Question stem:
n is not zero, so either pos or neg. could be non-integer.
yes/no question
In order for abs. value of n to be < 4, n would have to be between -4 and 4. So I can rephrase:
is -4 < n < 4? (and n is not zero)

(1)
I'll assume "n2" means n^2. Please correct me if that's wrong.
n^2 > 16
n > +4 and n < -4
definitive no. Sufficient. Eliminate B, C, E.

(2)
1/|n| > n
You're testing this as though you have to flip the sign when you multiply things by n, but you don't. n is inside an absolute value sign, and you are multiplying by everything (including the absolute value sign), which means that it's definitely positive (or it could be zero in a different problem, but not in this one, since n does not equal zero).

So you can just say 1 > n * |n| because what you're multiplying by is definitely a positive value. Don't do what a lot of you did next, though, and rewrite this as 1 > n^2. That's not equivalent!

Try some numbers above to understand what that inequality means. If n = -2, then n * |n| = -4. -4 < 1, so this fulfills statement 2. We're allowed to choose n = -2. In this case, n is between -4 and 4, so if n = -2, then the answer to the question is yes.

Now try something else and specifically see whether you can get a "no" answer (since you already have a yes). This requires us to pick something either smaller than -4 or larger than 4. What about n = -10? Then n * |n| = -100 and -100 < 1, so this also fulfills statement 2 and we're allowed to choose n = -10. This time, the answer to the question is no.

Essentially, if we use any negative number at all for n, we'll make the statement true (because if you multiply n by the absolute value of n, you will multiple one negative and one positive number; the result of that is always negative). But some negative numbers will give us a "yes" answer and some will give us a "no" answer.

Insufficient. Answer is A.

(Notice also that the statements do not contradict, as some said above. Statements should never contradict each other.)
thanks a lot Stacey for your explanation. That cleared all the doubts. Now i know whr my reasoning was wrong. Even while i solved it which i shouldnt have, i mistakenly took the range of both the scenarios and added them, which i can't do. i got n>-1 and n<1 and i made it
-1<n<1 which is wrong.
Anyways thanks for your approach. I will keep this in mind now.

Rajiv
Join the discussion

just great

by simba12123 » Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:29 pm
Stacy,

Thank you so much. I am learning to keep things as simple as possible. :)
Advancing to be reckoned with!
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:05 am
stacey for the win. a couple of extra comments, though:

first of all, here's a really important fact that you should know about absolute values and squares.
FACT: &#8730;(expression^2) = |expression|

you should know this. in words: if you square a quantity, and then take the square root of the resulting square, then you get the absolute value of the original expression.
this happens because squaring makes the quantity "go positive", and, once that happens, the quantity will still be positive once you have taken its square root.

therefore, since both sides of statement #1 are positive, you can take the square root of both sides:
n^2 > 16
&#8730;(n^2) > &#8730;16
|n| > 4
this is sufficient.

--

statement (2): your FIRST INSTINCT, for statements like this one, should be to TEST POSITIVES AND NEGATIVES.
in other words, you should test number properties (for positive and negative numbers) on statements like this one BEFORE you treat them as bona fide inequalities.
if you do so, you'll quickly realize that this statement is true for all negative numbers, as pointed out by stacey above. that realization proves that #2 is insufficient, as there are negative numbers whose absolute values are greater than 4 as well as negative numbers whose absolute values are less than 4.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:19 am
Hi Ian,

My doubt here is with following eqn:

n^2 > -1

How to interpret it logically? I dont want to pick a no and come to contradiction but some methods to find contradiction.

The two scenario here are: n^2<1 n^2>-1

Now what?
for n^2<1 is |n|<1 or -1<n<1

what should i do for n^2>-1??
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:55 pm
maihuna wrote: what should i do for n^2>-1??
Very often, the first questions I'll ask myself when looking at a simple inequality are the following: is the left side positive or negative? Is the right side positive or negative? If you see:

n^2 > -1

then the right side is clearly negative. The left side is either positive or zero. So the inequality is always true, and the inequality doesn't tell you anything about n. Alternatively, you could add 1 to both sides:

n^2 + 1 > 0

And since the left side is 1 or larger, the inequality is always true.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion