Please evaluate my AWA - Argument

This topic has expert replies

Rate my essay

1
0
No votes
2
0
No votes
3
1
50%
4
1
50%
5
0
No votes
6
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 2

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:30 am
Location: Delhi

Please evaluate my AWA - Argument

by temp33 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:32 am
The following appeared as part of a newspaper editorial:

"Two years ago Nova High School began to use interactive computer instruction in three academic subjects.
The school dropout rate declined immediately, and last year's graduates have reported some impressive achievements in college. In future budgets the school board should use a greater portion of the available funds to buy more computers, and all schools in the district should adopt interactive computer instruction throughout the curriculum."

Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The conclusion of the given argument is that all schools in the district should adopt interactive computer instruction throughout the curriculum. The author of the newspaper editorial cites certain premises such as the decline in school dropout rate, achievements in college to support his argument and thus also recommends adoption of greater spending and funding to buy more computers; however the argument where it stands is unconvincing and doesn't justify the author's view.

Firstly, the author assumes that the school dropout rate declined due to the use of interactive computer instruction in three academic subjects. However, there could be other factors like poor faculty in the other schools in the same area where Nova High School is located or the fact that Nova High School's faculty was very good that contributed towards a lower school dropout rate.

Secondly, the author considers the impressive achievements in college also as a result of the use of computer interactive instruction. The special achievements could also be as a result of the calibre of students, the daunting effort that students made or the entire team of teachers and students that worked together to accomplish those achievements.

Thirdly, the author recommends more spending of funds to buy more computers and the adoption of interactive computer instruction at all schools in the district throughout the curriculum. The author here fails to consider the software, medium of presentation used by the Nova High School and at the same time is trying to generalise the methodology adopted by a single school to all the schools in the same district.

Thus, to conclude, if the author had substantiated his argument with suitable examples and findings, the argument would have been more convincing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:30 am
Location: Delhi

by temp33 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:27 am
Hello members,

Can please advise me regarding the content, expected scores or suggest the suitable changes required.
I have my exam in a week's time...

Thanks a lot,
temp33 !

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:7 members

by grockit_andrea » Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:08 pm
You've got good organization here, and you do a good job of making your ideas clear. However, I think this would probably get a 3 or a 3.5, for a few reasons:
--Some of your paragraphs are skimpy; a paragraph should consist of at least 3 sentences, and although length alone won't get you a high score, you won't get above a 4 with a short essay. Flesh out your paragraphs a little more, particularly your conclusion.
--You point out errors, but you don't use the kind of argument analysis language that the readers are looking for. Integrate some of the ideas you see in Critical Reasoning; talk about unstated assumptions, the causation versus correlation, etc. Those key words show your reader that you really understand how the argument is put together.
--And finally, just from a technical standpoint, the first error that you point out (in the second paragraph) isn't correctly analyzed. The argument talks about a decline in the dropout rate, which would indicate that the dropout rate at Nova High School has declined from its rate in previous years, but you discuss comparisons with other schools, which are irrelevant. If the argument had made that school-to-school comparison, you would be correct in discussing the possible alternative causes, but since the decline is over time at only one school, those comparisons don't apply.

You obviously have a sense of what kind of structure and organization you need; now just focus on extending your analysis and making it more sharply focused. Best of luck with your upcoming exam!
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:30 am
Location: Delhi

by temp33 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:21 am
Thanks andrea...
Those are valuable comments and feedback and I shall surely work into that before I write the test...

I scored a 5.5 on the essay last time, but essay is something that you work towards the end upon..
But it does require some more effort and practice now..

Thanks a ton.. :)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:03 pm

by baotrang1308 » Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:18 am
Can I seek your kind advice on the same problem, please.....English is my second language and I dont have any teacher or any friends who are also studying GMAT, your feedback is really really helpful for me to know how I'm doing. Thanks thanks thanks.

Based on the school's lower dropout rate and recent graduates' impressive college achievements, the author has concluded the effectiveness of applying interactive computer instruction in the classroom after the school has tested the new technology in only three subjects. The author has prompted into conclusion too quickly to take into account other reasonable explanations. The argument is also constructed on several questionable assumptions that are unjustified and unsound as analyzed below.

Most conspicuously, the argument has assumed the decrease in school dropout rate is the result of new interactive computer instruction method. However, the assumption and result is not logically linked or well-explained, making it confusing for readers to understand the statement. The fact can be explained by the school's improved teaching method in all courses, new and more experienced professors, more convenient and newly constructed facilities, effective marketing campaigns and so on. There are so many reasons to explain for the decrease in dropout rate, not just the effectiveness of new instruction method alone. Thus, the author's statement is based on unsupported evidence and assumption, making the conclusion inaccurate.

Also, the school's dropout rate can be attributed to other family and economic factors. Student used to drop out from school as they have family problems or they have high paying jobs that they want to keep instead of going to school. However, if the family problems are resolved or economic downturn making the job market more competitive and less fruitful to job-seekers, especially students, they will choose to continue their studying and enhance their education. This explanation is very reasonable and should also be assessed in more details by the author, before any conclusion is made.

Last but not least, the author has mistakenly assumed some impressive achievements of last year's graduates are the effects of new instruction method in three courses. The author does not provide any further information regarding these achievements. These achievements could be acquired in courses that are not applied the new instruction method above. Therefore, the author cannot conclude the effectiveness of new instruction method that is applied in only 3 courses, based solely on the students' achievement in other courses.

After analyzing all the questionable assumptions and illogical arguments, it is concluded that the statement has not provide sound advice for implementing new instruction method. However, the statement is not totally incorrect or not based on any logical explanation. If it considers other aspects as described in the paragraphs above before proposing any action, the advice will be very useful in helping the school to improve its instruction method.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:7 members

by grockit_andrea » Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:49 pm
Baotrang, you have done well at identifying flaws and explaining how the argument could be strengthened or weakened. Your ideas are well-developed (which is to say, the essay is long enough to provide the detail necessary) and your organization is clear. Unfortunately, the only real advice I can offer you here is to work on your language skills before test day. Since English isn't your native language, you'll have to be extra-careful to use words correctly and make sure that you have as few grammatical errors as possible. There's no single error that's really egregious here, but the pattern of incorrect word usage and syntax or grammar errors is a little distracting. I think you'd get a 4 or a 5 on this, because the ideas and the technique are great, but the actual communication of those ideas needs polishing. Keep practicing, and best of luck for your continued improvement!
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:03 pm

by baotrang1308 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:27 am
Thank you so much Ms. Andrea, I really appreciate your advice. I will try to look at my choice of language to make sure it is appropriate. But it's not easy though as I don't really know how a work is sound and unsound in different context. My test is coming near and I have to work hard on it. Thanks so much for your time. :D

• Page 1 of 1