Range of a set

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:54 am

Range of a set

by kheba » Mon Oct 15, 2012 1:55 am
The Range of Set A is R. A number having equal value to R, is added to set A. Will the range of Set A increase ?

(1) All numbers in Set A are positive.
(2) The mean of the new set is smaller than R.

OA : C
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:50 am
Location: New Delhi
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:760

by nisagl750 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:48 pm
kheba wrote:The Range of Set A is R. A number having equal value to R, is added to set A. Will the range of Set A increase ?

(1) All numbers in Set A are positive.
(2) The mean of the new set is smaller than R.

OA : C
Range is the difference of largest and smallest number in the set. range will change if the number added will either be larger than the largest or smaller than the smallest number in the set.

So Question can be reframed as Is largest number in set A < R < smallest number in set A

Statement 1: If all numbers are positive eg: {1,2,3,4,5}
R= 5-1= 4
When 4 is added to the set A, Its range does not change...

For all positive sets R will be less than the largest number and greater than the smallest numbe rin SET A
Sufficient

Statement 2: Consider above example.... Avg will be 19/6 = 3.something which is less than 4 (here R=4) Range doesn't change

Consider set A = {-5,-1,3,7,11}
R=11-(-5) = 16
Avg = 31/6 = 5.something which is again less than R but in this case Range changes

Insufficient

IMOA

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:21 am
Thanked: 1 times

by jnicholson » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:59 pm
Be careful with data sufficiency! If we come up with a definite answer to the question given a statement, then the statement is sufficient. Therefore, we should try to arrive at multiple conclusions to prove the statement insufficient. For a Yes/No question, this means finding a YES case and a NO case. For value questions, this means finding multiple values that could answer the question.

Indeed, the range of a set is the difference between the largest value and the smallest. For example, if our set is {5, 21, 25}, our range would be 25-5=20.

Statement 1: All numbers in Set A are positive.

NO case: {2, 7, 10}
R = 10-2 = 8
Our new set is {2, 7, 8, 10}
Range of new set = 10-2 = 8
Therefore, our range does not change.

YES case: {22, 27, 30}
R = 30-22 = 8
Our new set is {8, 22, 27, 30}
Range of new set = 30-8 = 22
Therefore, the range of our set INCREASES.

Because we have a YES case and a NO case, statement 1 is INSUFFICIENT. In other words, we can not answer definitively YES or definitively NO.

Statement 2: The mean of the new set is smaller than R.

Here are three examples of sets that have means smaller than their respective ranges:

Example Set 1: {1,3,5,7}
Mean = 4, R = 6

Example Set 2: {0, 10, 12, 18}
Mean = 10, R = 18

Example Set 3: {-10, -8, 2, 4}
Mean = -3, R = 14

Again, our task is to prove the statement insufficient by finding a YES case and a NO case. We think to ourselves, "Given that mean<range in the new set, can I find a case in which the range increases? Can I find a case in which the range does not increase?"

NO case: Take Example Set 1 from above: {1,3,5,7}
Mean = 4, R = 6
Our new set is {1, 3, 5, 6, 7}
Range = 6
Mean of new set = (1+3+5+6+7)/5 = 22/5 = 4.4
4.4<6
Our range does not increase.

YES case: Take Example Set 3 from above: {-10, -8, 2, 4}
Mean = -3, R = 14
Our new set is {-10, -8, 2, 4, 14}
Range of new set = 14-(-10) = 24
Mean of new set = 2/5 = 0.4
0.4<14
Our range does increase.

Because we have a YES case and a NO case, statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT. In other words, we can not answer definitively YES or definitively NO.

Both statements together: All #'s in the set are positive, and the mean of the new set is less than R.

NO case: We can again use Example Set 1 from above: {1,3,5,7}
Mean = 4, R = 6
Our new set is {1, 3, 5, 6, 7}
Range of new set = 6 = R
Mean of new set = (1+3+5+6+7)/5 = 22/5 = 4.4
4.4<6
Our range does not increase.

If the mean is less than the range, then we would need to find an R greater than the largest value in the set in order to increase the range. The only way to have an R that is greater than the greatest value in the set is for the set to include at least one negative number. (Note that the range must be positive, so finding an R lower than 0 would be impossible.) Therefore, we cannot find a YES case given Statement 1 and 2 combined, and we have a definitive NO answer. The statements combined are sufficient.

Answer: C

There are probably more intuitive ways, but you can use this explanation as an exercise to build your intuition. Good luck! :D

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:50 am
Location: New Delhi
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:760

by nisagl750 » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:38 pm
jnicholson wrote:Be careful with data sufficiency! If we come up with a definite answer to the question given a statement, then the statement is sufficient. Therefore, we should try to arrive at multiple conclusions to prove the statement insufficient. For a Yes/No question, this means finding a YES case and a NO case. For value questions, this means finding multiple values that could answer the question.

Indeed, the range of a set is the difference between the largest value and the smallest. For example, if our set is {5, 21, 25}, our range would be 25-5=20.

Statement 1: All numbers in Set A are positive.

NO case: {2, 7, 10}
R = 10-2 = 8
Our new set is {2, 7, 8, 10}
Range of new set = 10-2 = 8
Therefore, our range does not change.

YES case: {22, 27, 30}
R = 30-22 = 8
Our new set is {8, 22, 27, 30}
Range of new set = 30-8 = 22
Therefore, the range of our set INCREASES.

Because we have a YES case and a NO case, statement 1 is INSUFFICIENT. In other words, we can not answer definitively YES or definitively NO.

Statement 2: The mean of the new set is smaller than R.

Here are three examples of sets that have means smaller than their respective ranges:

Example Set 1: {1,3,5,7}
Mean = 4, R = 6

Example Set 2: {0, 10, 12, 18}
Mean = 10, R = 18

Example Set 3: {-10, -8, 2, 4}
Mean = -3, R = 14

Again, our task is to prove the statement insufficient by finding a YES case and a NO case. We think to ourselves, "Given that mean<range in the new set, can I find a case in which the range increases? Can I find a case in which the range does not increase?"

NO case: Take Example Set 1 from above: {1,3,5,7}
Mean = 4, R = 6
Our new set is {1, 3, 5, 6, 7}
Range = 6
Mean of new set = (1+3+5+6+7)/5 = 22/5 = 4.4
4.4<6
Our range does not increase.

YES case: Take Example Set 3 from above: {-10, -8, 2, 4}
Mean = -3, R = 14
Our new set is {-10, -8, 2, 4, 14}
Range of new set = 14-(-10) = 24
Mean of new set = 2/5 = 0.4
0.4<14
Our range does increase.

Because we have a YES case and a NO case, statement 2 is INSUFFICIENT. In other words, we can not answer definitively YES or definitively NO.

Both statements together: All #'s in the set are positive, and the mean of the new set is less than R.

NO case: We can again use Example Set 1 from above: {1,3,5,7}
Mean = 4, R = 6
Our new set is {1, 3, 5, 6, 7}
Range of new set = 6 = R
Mean of new set = (1+3+5+6+7)/5 = 22/5 = 4.4
4.4<6
Our range does not increase.

If the mean is less than the range, then we would need to find an R greater than the largest value in the set in order to increase the range. The only way to have an R that is greater than the greatest value in the set is for the set to include at least one negative number. (Note that the range must be positive, so finding an R lower than 0 would be impossible.) Therefore, we cannot find a YES case given Statement 1 and 2 combined, and we have a definitive NO answer. The statements combined are sufficient.

Answer: C

There are probably more intuitive ways, but you can use this explanation as an exercise to build your intuition. Good luck! :D
I missed that YES case in STATEMENT 1
My BAD :(