BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

OG 16, SC Q37

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 3:18 pm
by parry » Tue Oct 20, 2015 4:14 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Not trusting themselves to choose wisely among the wide array of investment opportunities on the market, stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily bought directly.

(A) stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily

(B) stockbrokers are helping many people who are turning to them for help in buying stocks that they could easily have

(C) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them to buy stocks that could be easily

(D) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help to buy stocks that easily could have been

(E) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that could easily be

OA is E.

Could somebody explain when "IN BUYING" is better than "TO BUY"? I chose D over E, because i thought D shows the intent (to but stocks) of people who are turning to stockbrokers.

Also those people WERE not able to buy the stocks and therefore they ARE truning to the stockbrokers.
What am I missing in the above sentence? Please explain.

Regards
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:50 am
Thanked: 11 times

by thang » Tue Oct 20, 2015 9:19 pm
I look at the oxford dictionary online

help as a noun has idiom

help in doing.

another problem is "from them" in E is redundant. "could have been" in D is wrong. this phrase refers to action previous to action in main clause.
looking for the girl living in Bradford UK, visiting Halong bay, Vietnam on 26- 27 Jan 2014. all persons, pls, forward this message to all persons you know to help me find her: my email: [email protected], call: 84904812758
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:35 am
parry wrote:Not trusting themselves to choose wisely among the wide array of investment opportunities on the market, stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily bought directly.

(A) stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily

(B) stockbrokers are helping many people who are turning to them for help in buying stocks that they could easily have

(C) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them to buy stocks that could be easily

(D) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help to buy stocks that easily could have been

(E) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that could easily be
An introductory VERBing modifier must serve to refer to the SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING CLAUSE.
In A and B, not trusting seems to refer to stockbrokers -- the subject of the following clause -- implying that STOCKBROKERS are NOT TRUSTING themselves.
Not the intended meaning.
The intended meaning is that MANY PEOPLE are not trusting themselves, with the result that they are turning to stockbrokers for help.
Eliminate A and B.

C: Many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them
Here, them and stockbrokers are redundant.
It would be sufficient to say the following:
Many people are turning to stockbrokers for help.
Eliminate C.

The present perfect (has/have + VERBed) cannot serve to express a GENERAL TRUTH.
D: stocks that easily could have been purchased directly
Here, the intent is discuss a GENERAL TRUTH about the stocks being purchased: they COULD BE PURCHASED directly.
Thus, the usage of the present perfect (have been purchased) is inappropriate.
Eliminate D.

The correct answer is E.

In D, for help to buy stocks is unidiomatic.
Correct idiom:
X asks for help IN DOING Y.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 3:18 pm

by parry » Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:29 pm
Thanks a lot for excellent reply GMATGuruNY.


Use of "people ARE turning...." in D & E got me thinking that it is a new phonomenon.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 8 times

by RBBmba@2014 » Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:19 am
hi Guru - a quick question on C.

Isn't the following another potential ERROR in C -- them refers to stockbrokers, whereas themselves in the non-underlined part refers to many people. But on GMAT, any Subject pronoun of same category MUST have same ANTECEDENT.

Correct me please if wrong!
GMATGuruNY wrote:Correct idiom:
X asks for help IN DOING Y.
In another OG Qs (OG 12,SC#59) it uses this construction -- The Olympic Games helped to keep peace. So, how these TWO usages are DIFFERENT exactly ?

Can you please shed some light on this aspect ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:41 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:hi Guru - a quick question on C.

Isn't the following another potential ERROR in C -- them refers to stockbrokers, whereas themselves in the non-underlined part refers to many people. But on GMAT, any Subject pronoun of same category MUST have same ANTECEDENT.

Correct me please if wrong!
This line of reasoning is viable.
GMATGuruNY wrote:Correct idiom:
X asks for help IN DOING Y.
In another OG Qs (OG 12,SC#59) it uses this construction -- The Olympic Games helped to keep peace. So, how these TWO usages are DIFFERENT exactly ?

Can you please shed some light on this aspect ?
help in buying stocks
Here, help is a NOUN.
When help serves as a noun, help + in + VERBing is correct.

helped to keep peace
Here, helped is a VERB.
When help serves as a VERB, help + INFINITIVE is correct.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:18 pm

by Alchemist14 » Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:39 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
RBBmba@2014 wrote:hi Guru - a quick question on C.

Isn't the following another potential ERROR in C -- them refers to stockbrokers, whereas themselves in the non-underlined part refers to many people. But on GMAT, any Subject pronoun of same category MUST have same ANTECEDENT.

Correct me please if wrong!
This line of reasoning is viable.
GMATGuruNY wrote:Correct idiom:
X asks for help IN DOING Y.
In another OG Qs (OG 12,SC#59) it uses this construction -- The Olympic Games helped to keep peace. So, how these TWO usages are DIFFERENT exactly ?

Can you please shed some light on this aspect ?
help in buying stocks
Here, help is a NOUN.
When help serves as a noun, help + in + VERBing is correct.

helped to keep peace
Here, helped is a VERB.
When help serves as a VERB, help + INFINITIVE is correct.
GMATGuruNY awesome explanation.

Just a few doubts.

1.'For help to buy' means that X asks Y for help with the objective of buying shares right? But this is not what the sentence wants. The sentence wants to say that X asks Y for help in selecting stocks. Is my line of reasoning correct?

2.Is it a rule that we cannot use noun+infinitive?

Thanks and Regards,
Alchemist14
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:27 am
Alchemist14 wrote: GMATGuruNY awesome explanation.

Just a few doubts.

1.'For help to buy' means that X asks Y for help with the objective of buying shares right? But this is not what the sentence wants. The sentence wants to say that X asks Y for help in selecting stocks. Is my line of reasoning correct?
In most cases, an infinitive modifier will serve to express the INTENT of the preceding subject.
Here, the usage of help to buy is incorrect both idiomatically and semantically.
It seems to imply that PEOPLE intend TO BUY stocks on their own, with the HELP of stockbrokers.
The actual process is just the opposite: STOCKBROKERS buy stocks ON BEHALF OF people.
Thus, the usage of help to buy does not convey the intended meaning.
That said, the error here is primarily idiomatic, as discussed in my posts above.
2.Is it a rule that we cannot use noun+infinitive?
An infinitive modifier may follow a noun.
SC15 in the OG12:
The National Academy of Sciences has urged THE NATION TO CREATE a special government ORGANIZATION TO TAKE CHARGE of computer security planning.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:34 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Crystal W » Sat May 14, 2016 11:43 pm
I have a question about the placement of the adverb "easily". I believe the adverb can be put in any place, before or after the verb, to modify the verb. However, the OG said it only can be "could easily be bought directly". Can somebody explain this one?
Thanks in advance!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 2:27 pmFollowed by: 8 members

by [email protected] » Wed Mar 13, 2019 1:41 pm
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question, and tackle one issue at a time! Before we dive in, here is the original question, with any major differences between the options highlighted in orange:

Not trusting themselves to choose wisely among the wide array of investment opportunities on the market, stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily bought directly.

(A) stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily
(B) stockbrokers are helping many people who are turning to them for help in buying stocks that they could easily have
(C) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them to buy stocks that could be easily
(D) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help to buy stocks that easily could have been
(E) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that could easily be

After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences pop out:

1. Starting with "stockbrokers" vs. "many people" (modifier-antecedent agreement)
2. Form of the verb "to help": helping / for help to / for help in (verb tense/idioms)
3. How they end: could be easily / could easily have / could have been (verb tense/meaning)

Let's start with #1 on our list because no matter which method we choose, we'll eliminate 2-3 options right away. The modifying phrase, "Not trusting themselves to choose wisely among the wide array of investment opportunities on the market," MUST be immediately followed by who/what it's referring to. In this case, the people hiring stockbrokers are the ones who don't trust themselves to invest properly. Let's see which options correctly place the modifier and antecedent next to each other:

(A) stockbrokers are helping many people who turn to them to buy stocks that could be easily
(B) stockbrokers are helping many people who are turning to them for help in buying stocks that they could easily have
(C) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them to buy stocks that could be easily
(D) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help to buy stocks that easily could have been
(E) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that could easily be

We can eliminate options A & B because they don't place the people who hire stockbrokers next to the modifier phrase. It doesn't make sense to say that the stockbrokers don't trust themselves to buy stocks - that's their job!

Now that we've narrowed it down to 3 options, let's take a look at #2 and #3 on the list, and see which option handles both correctly:

(C) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help from them to buy stocks that could be easily

This option is INCORRECT because it's redundant. It's not necessary to repeat that people are getting help from stockbrokers - it's clear enough already without the extra addition of a pronoun. It's also not idiomatically correct to say that someone seeks "help to" do something - we say that we seek out "help in" doing something.

(D) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help to buy stocks that easily could have been

This is INCORRECT for a couple reasons. First, it's not idiomatically correct to say a person seeks "help to" doing something - they seek "help in" doing something. Second, by using the past tense "could have been," it slightly changes the meaning. It says that people are turning to stockbrokers in the present to buy stocks that were hard to buy in the past, but aren't difficult to buy today?? That doesn't really make sense. They're easy to buy in the present too, but people still hire stockbrokers to help them in the present.

(E) many people are turning to stockbrokers for help in buying stocks that could easily be

This is CORRECT! It uses the correct idiom structure "for help in" doing something, and it uses present tense to say that stocks are easy to buy in the present, but people still hire brokers to help them anyway. The meaning is logical and clear, so this is our best choice.

There you have it - option E is our correct choice!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:19 pmFollowed by: 1 member

by vietnam47 » Fri Aug 09, 2019 7:13 am
could can be the past tense of "can", which show ability, possibility and request.
but could can be use in present time to show possibility and request more hesitately and more politely

so, in E, "could be" show a possibility in present. never think " could" is only for the past time.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1