BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

According to scientists at the University of California

Expert replies
by AbhiS » Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:49 am
According to scientists at the University of California, the pattern of changes that have occurred in human DNA over the millennia indicate the possibility that everyone alive today might be descended from a single female ancestor who lived in Africa sometime between 140,000 and 280,000 years ago.

(A) indicate the possibility that everyone alive today might be descended from a single female ancestor who
(B) indicate that everyone alive today might possibly be a descendant of a single female ancestor who had
(C) may indicate that everyone alive today has descended from a single female ancestor who had
(D) indicates that everyone alive today may be a descendant of a single female ancestor who
(E) indicates that everyone alive today might be a descendant from a single female ancestor who

OA : D
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by AbhiS » Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:50 am
Can someone explain me why - have (pural verb form in the non-underlined part) OK with the subject the pattern which is singular

Thanks in advance
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:59 am
AbhiS wrote:Can someone explain me why - have (pural verb form in the non-underlined part) OK with the subject the pattern which is singular

Thanks in advance
In this sentence, "have" is used for "changes" as the pronoun that is used with changes.

"pattern" is the subject and the corresponding verb is "indicates"....
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by AbhiS » Wed Nov 06, 2013 9:32 am
theCodeToGMAT wrote:
AbhiS wrote:Can someone explain me why - have (pural verb form in the non-underlined part) OK with the subject the pattern which is singular

Thanks in advance
In this sentence, "have" is used for "changes" as the pronoun that is used with changes.

"pattern" is the subject and the corresponding verb is "indicates"....
I am not sure what you are trying to say. Can you clarify with an example
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:38 am
AbhiS wrote:According to scientists at the University of California, the pattern of changes that have occurred in human DNA over the millennia indicate the possibility that everyone alive today might be descended from a single female ancestor who lived in Africa sometime between 140,000 and 280,000 years ago.

(A) indicate the possibility that everyone alive today might be descended from a single female ancestor who
(B) indicate that everyone alive today might possibly be a descendant of a single female ancestor who had
(C) may indicate that everyone alive today has descended from a single female ancestor who had
(D) indicates that everyone alive today may be a descendant of a single female ancestor who
(E) indicates that everyone alive today might be a descendant from a single female ancestor who

OA : D
In A and B, indicate (plural) does not agree with pattern (singular).
Eliminate A and B.

To express a GENERAL TRUTH -- something that is true now and is expected to remain true in the future -- we use the simple present tense.
The sentence above is expressing a general truth about everyone alive today.
Thus, in C, has descended (present perfect) is inappropriate.
Eliminate C.

In E, descendant from is unidiomatic.
The correct idiom is X is a descendant OF Y.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.

In the non-underlined portion, have occurred (plural) agrees with changes (also plural).
Conveyed meaning:
CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED in human DNA.
The PATTERN of these changes INDICATES that everyone alive today may be a descendant of a single female ancestor.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by kisna_428 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:40 am
Can we spot error by making difference between May and might in D and E ?
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:13 pm
Hi kisna_428,

The bigger difference between D and E is the usage of "descendant"

The phrase "descendant OF" is correct.

Another correct phrase would be "descendED FROM", but that isn't an option in D or E.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by kisna_428 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:59 pm
Because it is indicates , can we not assume we should prefer may to might?
Might may be considered with indicated ?



I am not good at idioms so can not readily depend on idioms!
Join the discussion

by guptas » Sat Nov 23, 2013 7:26 pm
descendant of-makes sense, not descendant from.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1