BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

even odd

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Frankenstein » Sun Aug 28, 2011 4:34 am
Hi,
Tk = k(k+1)/2
From(1):
For Tn=6, n = 3 (odd)
For Tn=10, n = 4 (even)
Not sufficient

From(2):
T2n = (2n)(2n+1)/2 = n(2n+1).
2n+1 is always odd. So, for n(2n+1) to be even, n has to be even.
Sufficient

Hence, B
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:01 am
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
Tk = k(k+1)/2
From(1):
For Tn=6, n = 3 (odd)
For Tn=10, n = 4 (even)
Not sufficient

From(2):
T2n = (2n)(2n+1)/2 = n(2n+1).
2n+1 is always odd. So, for n(2n+1) to be even, n has to be even.
Sufficient

Hence, B
Nice solution as usual, Frankenstein.

I thought I should point out to other viewers that Frankenstein is using a formula for finding the sum of all positive integers from 1 to k.

The formula goes like this: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...k = k(k+1)/2

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by subhakam » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:30 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
Tk = k(k+1)/2
From(1):
For Tn=6, n = 3 (odd)
For Tn=10, n = 4 (even)
Not sufficient

From(2):
T2n = (2n)(2n+1)/2 = n(2n+1).
2n+1 is always odd. So, for n(2n+1) to be even, n has to be even.
Sufficient

Hence, B
Nice solution as usual, Frankenstein.

I thought I should point out to other viewers that Frankenstein is using a formula for finding the sum of all positive integers from 1 to k.

The formula goes like this: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...k = k(k+1)/2

Cheers,
Brent
Hello Brent - i did not understand the solution - can you explain please how the formula becomes 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...k = k(k+1)/2?

Thank you very much!
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:33 pm
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ...+k = k(k+1)/2

So, for example, the sum 1+2+3+4+.....+39+40 = (40)(41)/2 = 820
Similarly, 1+2+3+4+.....+58+59 = (59)(60)/2 = 1770

Does that answer your question?

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by subhakam » Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:34 pm
Thank you Brent - this helps greatly.

Follow up question is - whether the below formula valid only for consecutive integers or for other evenly spaced sets as well where the difference between any 2 terms could be 5, 6 , -2 , 1/2 etc? What would be the formula for consecutive integers in decreasing order?

Lastly, the above does not hold valid (in my opinion) where some of the integers might be repeated in the set ? E.g. 1+2+3+3+3+4+4+5+5........+k ?

Many thanks once again!!
Subhakam
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Jan 25, 2013 7:35 am
subhakam wrote:Thank you Brent - this helps greatly.

Follow up question is - whether the below formula valid only for consecutive integers or for other evenly spaced sets as well where the difference between any 2 terms could be 5, 6 , -2 , 1/2 etc? What would be the formula for consecutive integers in decreasing order?

Lastly, the above does not hold valid (in my opinion) where some of the integers might be repeated in the set ? E.g. 1+2+3+3+3+4+4+5+5........+k ?

Many thanks once again!!
Subhakam
The formula k(k+1)/2 is specifically for the sum of consecutive integers from 1 to k.

Having said that, we can often make some adjustments to our sum in order to apply the formula.
For example:
7+14+21+28+....+203+210 = 7(1+2+3+4+....29+30)
= 7[(30)(31)/2]
= 7[465]
= 3255

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by subhakam » Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:42 pm
Thank you very much Brent!
Join the discussion