IMO because D creates a run on sentence...shilpi84 wrote:I still do not get why D is wrong!
"have" is verb but "with" is not a verb.
so D joins two totally independent clauses with just comma....i.e. creates a run-on sentence.
IMO because D creates a run on sentence...shilpi84 wrote:I still do not get why D is wrong!
due to which the clause clearly refers to immediately preceding noun i.e. islands.yashanth.ponnanna wrote:"A" should be it. "E" is wrong because "which have" could refer to the republic of phillipines or to the islands. The verb does not make a specific reference to a noun.
IMO Yes.viju9162 wrote:Friends,
I am bit confused with the pronoun reference here. Please help me to understand.
After the comma:
(1) two of them - Them refers to islands ( that's why them is plural)
(2) its area - Its refer to republic of Philippines
Am I correct here?
Kindly post ur query after the question as it gives a hint to the correct answer choice and reduces the effectiveness..goelmohit2002 wrote:Hi All,
In the below question, OA is[spoiler] "A"[/spoiler]. Although OA looks to be best, but can some one please help me understand what is the reasosn for kicking out "E" ?
============================================
The republic of Philippines encompasses more than seven thousand islands, two of them with two thirds of its area.
A) two of them with two thirds of its area
B) two thirds of their area being in two of them
C) and its area is two thirds in two islands
D) two of them have two thirds of its area
E) which have two thirds of its area in two of them
I would like to have Official Explanation if possible coz i think here we should look for run-on sentences as well in selecting the right choice. I just wanna confirm whether i am correct about using run-on sentence concept here..goelmohit2002 wrote:As I mentioned in the original post...the OA is "A".
IMO that is explained in the above thread itself....necromancer_678 wrote:Difference b/w A&D...
anybody???