Critical Reasoning

OG-12, Q89: Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.

B. The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.

C. The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.

D. The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seek to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.

E. The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seek to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seek to establish.



The OA is A.However, I chose D. Can anyone please help me in refuting the option that i selected. Obviously the argument seeks to establish the conclusion. The conclusion must be They might well be overoptimistic. And the second bold faced explains why the reasoning may be overoptimistic.