BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan GMAT 2011- Inequality Question (If Sidney is Taller..

Expert replies
by edwardsmichele » Sun Sep 26, 2010 2:10 pm
Practice Test - Page 600, Question #2 (I checked the forum before posting and did not find a prior posting)

I am looking for some efficient way to approach this since the time can go by quite quickly while one is arriving at the right answer (E). This question is rather intriguing since it seems to combine a word problem with critical reasoning.

Here is the question:
If Sidney is taller than Roger, Roger is taller than Vernon, and Billy is taller than both Roger and Felix, then which of the following statements must be true?

(A) Felix is shorter than Roger.
(B) Sidney is taller than Billy.
(C) Roger is shorter than Felix.
(D) Sidney is taller than Felix.
(E) Billy is taller than Vernon.

Kaplan gives the correct response as E - and that is certainly clear - after one spends some time with the answer choices. However, Kaplan suggests making a "scratchwork chart" - but unless one can do this very efficiently - a good amount of time can slip away.

Thanks for any suggested strategies for efficient resolution.

Shelley
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by narik11 » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:40 pm
edwardsmichele wrote:Practice Test - Page 600, Question #2 (I checked the forum before posting and did not find a prior posting)

I am looking for some efficient way to approach this since the time can go by quite quickly while one is arriving at the right answer (E). This question is rather intriguing since it seems to combine a word problem with critical reasoning.

Here is the question:
If Sidney is taller than Roger, Roger is taller than Vernon, and Billy is taller than both Roger and Felix, then which of the following statements must be true?

(A) Felix is shorter than Roger.
(B) Sidney is taller than Billy.
(C) Roger is shorter than Felix.
(D) Sidney is taller than Felix.
(E) Billy is taller than Vernon.

Kaplan gives the correct response as E - and that is certainly clear - after one spends some time with the answer choices. However, Kaplan suggests making a "scratchwork chart" - but unless one can do this very efficiently - a good amount of time can slip away.

Thanks for any suggested strategies for efficient resolution.

Shelley
From Question:

(i) S>R

(ii) R>V

(iii) B>(R & F)

So from (ii) B>V

=> B>(R,F,V) So option E is correct..

Hope this helps..
I am not aware of what scratch work chart Is. :(
Join the discussion

by limestone » Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:53 pm
Hi,
My approach is to write all the relationships down (take the first letter of all the names for short):
S>R
R>V
B>R
B>F
Then before coming to the answer choices, I shorten all the premises:
S>R>V
B>R
B>F

A. F<R, cannot be defined, B is taller than both R and F, however, there's no relationship between F and R.
B. S>B, cannot be defined too, both S and B are taller than R, however, there's still no relationship between S and B.
C. R<F, same as in A, cannot be defined - no relationship between F and R.
D. S>F, cannot be defined, as S is taller than R, however there's no relationship between F and R.
E. B>V, well, that's it. B>R and R>V as stated in the premises, then B>R>V. Correct

If you are familiar with this approach, you will need only less than 1 and a half minute to solve such a problem. ( Write down 15 seconds, think about choices 10 seconds/each)
"There is nothing either good or bad - but thinking makes it so" - Shakespeare.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:15 pm
narik11 wrote:
I am not aware of what scratch work chart Is. :(
It's not a technical term. A diagram that you make of this information could, for example, look more like

......F
B >
S > R > V

You have to imagine that the "B >" is going with both F and R, unifying it into a single diagram (it would be clearer on scratch paper).
Join the discussion

by edwardsmichele » Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:29 am
limestone wrote:Hi,
My approach is to write all the relationships down (take the first letter of all the names for short):
S>R
R>V
B>R
B>F
Then before coming to the answer choices, I shorten all the premises:
S>R>V
B>R
B>F

A. F<R, cannot be defined, B is taller than both R and F, however, there's no relationship between F and R.
B. S>B, cannot be defined too, both S and B are taller than R, however, there's still no relationship between S and B.
C. R<F, same as in A, cannot be defined - no relationship between F and R.
D. S>F, cannot be defined, as S is taller than R, however there's no relationship between F and R.
E. B>V, well, that's it. B>R and R>V as stated in the premises, then B>R>V. Correct

If you are familiar with this approach, you will need only less than 1 and a half minute to solve such a problem. ( Write down 15 seconds, think about choices 10 seconds/each)
Limestone,

Thank you for this beautiful, detailed response. It is most helpful. I also appreciate that you answered so quickly.

Shelley
Join the discussion