BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each \(p\) percent greater in \(1998\) than in \(1995.\) What is the value of

Expert replies
by Vincen » Thu Dec 16, 2021 11:39 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each \(p\) percent greater in \(1998\) than in \(1995.\) What is the value of \(p?\)

(1) In \(1995\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,000\) greater than Jason's.
(2) In \(1998\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,440\) greater than Jason's.

Answer: C

Source: GMAT Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Vincen wrote:
Thu Dec 16, 2021 11:39 am
Janson's salary and Karen's salary were each \(p\) percent greater in \(1998\) than in \(1995.\) What is the value of \(p?\)

(1) In \(1995\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,000\) greater than Jason's.
(2) In \(1998\) Karen's salary was \(\$2,440\) greater than Jason's.

Answer: C

Source: GMAT Prep
Target question: What is the value of p?

Given: Jason's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995.
IMPORTANT: If my 1998 salary is p percent greater than my 1995 salary, then: 1998 salary = (1 + p/100)(1995 salary)
For example, if my 1998 salary is 7 percent greater than my 1995 salary, then: 1998 salary = (1 + 7/100)(1995 salary) = 1.07(1995 salary)

Let K = Karen's salary in 1995
Let J = Jason's salary in 1995
So, (1 + p/100)K = Karen's salary in 1998
And (1 + p/100)J = Jason's salary in 1998

Statement 1: In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's
So, we get K - J = 2000
So there's no information about p, so we can't determine the value of p
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: In 1998 Karen's salary was $2,440 greater than Jason's
We get: (1 + p/100)K - (1 + p/100)J = 2400
NOTICE that we can rewrite this as: (1 + p/100)(K - J) = 2400
Since we cannot solve this equation for p, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
From statement 1, we concluded that K - J = 2000
From statement 2, we concluded that (1 + p/100)(K - J) = 2400

Now take the second equation and replace (K - J) with 2000 to get: (1 + p/100)(2000) = 2400
At this point, we need only recognize that we COULD solve this equation for p, but we're not going to, since this would waste valuable time on the time-sensitive GMAT.
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion